Smokes and sheathing the interconnect

Joined
25 Oct 2005
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Location
Surrey
Country
United Kingdom
When wiring in smoke alarms with an interconnect does the the interconnect need sheathing?

I'm asking as the manual for alarm states that the interconnect should be treated as live. Obviously if I sheath the interconnect it will not be obvious to someone later on which is which unless I leave the sheath short so the wire can still be partly seen.

Thanks
 
Sponsored Links
Sleeving to identify it is a live conductor. Its a three core +earth cable and the third (GREY) is the interconnect.
 
Sleeving to identify it is a live conductor. Its a three core +earth cable and the third (GREY) is the interconnect.
Yes, in a single-phase installation, strictly speaking, any conductor other than brown which is used as a 'line'/phase (a.k.a 'live') conductor should be over-sleeved with brown at the terminations. Assuming that you are using the black as neutral, that should be over-sleeved with blue at its terminations.
I'm asking as the manual for alarm states that the interconnect should be treated as live. Obviously if I sheath the interconnect it will not be obvious to someone later on which is which unless I leave the sheath short so the wire can still be partly seen.
Yes, that's what one normally does - use a bit of over-sleeving short enough that the underlying insulation can also be seen.

Kind Regards, John
 
Sponsored Links
Yes, you only have to 'identify' what the conductor is being used for. you don't have to completely hide its original colour.

It could be argued that the conductor is identified by the terminal markings - L, N and whatever mark identifies the signal wire.
If not, you wouldn't know which to connect to what in the first place.
 
Yes, you only have to 'identify' what the conductor is being used for. you don't have to completely hide its original colour.
Indeed.
It could be argued that the conductor is identified by the terminal markings - L, N and whatever mark identifies the signal wire. If not, you wouldn't know which to connect to what in the first place.
Interesting. I must say that I've never thought of that or heard anyone trying to use that argument. I had always presumed (as I also presumed others did) that the intent was that the conductors of the cable itself should be 'identified', so that the identification remains even when the cable is disconnected from terminals - but I accept that the regs do not seem to say that explicitly.

Kind Regards, John
 
It doesn't need sleeving, Its not eactly a switched-live as such (think about the alarms signalling to each other in a power cut), table 51 gives a number of different colours acceptable in a control circuit. Although it should be noted that it is standard practice to use the black as interconnect, and then to sleeve the grey as blue and use as neutral.

I beleive the manufacturers instructions are probably trying to make the point that it should be treated a live conductor (i.e. not earthed, or part of an electrically separate system), rather than as a line conductor, which would need to be identified as such
 
Is the 'interconnect' control voltage of a mains-powered smoke alarm LV or ELV? I would rather presume the latter, since they presumably have to be able to 'link', as well as 'work' when running from their backup battery?

Kind Regards, John
 
As stated keeping it black is the best as black is a permissible colour. It should not be identified brown as it is not a 230V phase conductor.
 
As stated keeping it black is the best as black is a permissible colour.
I think this is all getting a bit confused/confusing. Black is a permissible colour for identifying a control circuit line conductor, but Andy suggested that it was not a line conductor, and ...
.... It should not be identified brown as it is not a 230V phase conductor.
... but, just like black, brown is also permissible colour for identifying a control circuit line conductor - so, if we are going to call this a 'control circuit' (which I think is probably the main thing which is confusing the issue) brown would be no less 'permissible' than black, would it?

Kind Regards, John
 
Is the 'interconnect' control voltage of a mains-powered smoke alarm LV or ELV? I would rather presume the latter, since they presumably have to be able to 'link', as well as 'work' when running from their backup battery?
I woudl presume it's ELV voltages but not safety-isolated from the mains. So it has to be treated like mains from an insulation point of view.
 
I think this is all getting a bit confused/confusing. Black is a permissible colour for identifying a control circuit line conductor, but Andy suggested that it was not a line conductor, and ...
... but, just like black, brown is also permissible colour for identifying a control circuit line conductor - so, if we are going to call this a 'control circuit' (which I think is probably the main thing which is confusing the issue) brown would be no less 'permissible' than black, would it?

Kind Regards, John
It's supposed to be distinguishable from the 230V phase though, so brown isn't strictly correct.
 
It's supposed to be distinguishable from the 230V phase though, so brown isn't strictly correct.
.. but you can't really have it both ways. You say it should be black, because BS7671 says that is 'permissible' for the line conductor of a control circuit, but also say it can't be brown, even though BS7671 says that is also 'permissible' for the line conductor of a control circuit.

Kind Regards, John
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top