Stella Awards

Joined
7 Jan 2007
Messages
8,836
Reaction score
1,230
Country
United Kingdom
STELLA AWARDS



It's time again for the annual 'Stella Awards'! For those unfamiliar
with these awards, they are named after 81-year-old Stella Liebeck
who spilled hot coffee on herself and successfully sued the McDonald's in
New Mexico , where she purchased coffee. You remember, she took the lid off
the coffee and put it between her knees while she was driving. Who would
ever think one could get burned doing that, right? That's right; these
are awards for the most outlandish lawsuits and verdicts in the U.S. You
know, the kinds of cases that make you scratch your head. So keep your head
scratcher handy.


Here are the Stellas for this past year --


*SEVENTH PLACE*

Kathleen Robertson of Austin, Texas was awarded $80,000 by a jury of her
peers after breaking her ankle tripping over a toddler who was running
inside a furniture store. The store owners were understandably surprised by
the verdict, considering the running toddler was her own son.

Start scratching!


* SIXTH PLACE *

Carl Truman, 19, of Los Angeles, California won $74,000 plus medical
expenses when his neighbour ran over his hand with a Honda Accord. Truman
apparently didn't notice there was someone at the wheel of the car when he
was trying to steal his neighbour's hubcaps.

Scratch some more...


* FIFTH PLACE *

Terrence Dickson, of Bristol, Pennsylvania, who was leaving a house he had
just burglarized by way of the garage. Unfortunately for Dickson, the
automatic garage door opener malfunctioned and he could not get the garage
door to open. Worse, he couldn't re-enter the house because the door
connecting the garage to the house locked when Dickson pulled it shut.
Forced to sit for eight, count 'em, EIGHT days and survive on a case of
Pepsi and a large bag of dry dog food, he sued the homeowner's insurance
company claiming undue mental Anguish. Amazingly, the jury said the
insurance company must pay Dickson $500,000 for his anguish. We should all
have this kind of anguish Keep scratching. There are more...

Double hand scratching after this one..


*FOURTH PLACE*

Jerry Williams, of Little Rock, Arkansas, garnered 4th Place in the Stella's
when he was awarded $14,500 plus medical expenses after being bitten on the
butt by his next door neighbour's beagle - even though the beagle was on a
chain in its owner's fenced yard. Williams did not get as much as he asked
for because the jury believed the beagle might have been provoked at the
time of the butt bite because Williams had climbed over the fence into the
yard and repeatedly shot the dog with a pellet gun.

Pick a new spot to scratch, you're getting a bald spot..


* THIRD PLACE *

Amber Carson of Lancaster, Pennsylvania because a jury ordered a
Philadelphia restaurant to pay her $113,500 after she slipped on a
spilled soft drink and broke her tailbone. The reason the soft drink was on
the floor: Ms. Carson had thrown it at her boyfriend 30 seconds earlier
during an argument. What ever happened to people being responsible for their
own actions?

Only two more so ease up on the scratching...


*SECOND PLACE*

Kara Walton, of Claymont, Delaware sued the owner of a night club in a
nearby city because she fell from the bathroom window to the floor, knocking
out her two front teeth. Even though Ms. Walton was trying to sneak through
the ladies room window to avoid paying the $3.50 cover charge, the jury said
the night club had to pay her $12,000....oh, yeah, plus dental expenses.


Ok. Here we go!!


* FIRST PLACE *

This year's runaway First Place Stella Award winner was: Mrs. Merv
Grazinski, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, who purchased a new 32-foot Winnebago
motor home. On her first trip home, from a football game, having driven on
to the freeway, she set the cruise control at 70 mph and calmly left the
driver's seat to go to the back of the Winnebago to make herself a
sandwich. Not surprisingly, the motor home left the freeway, crashed and
overturned. Also not surprisingly, Mrs. Grazinski sued Winnebago for not
putting in the owner's manual that she couldn't actually leave the driver's
seat while the cruise control was set. The Oklahoma jury awarded her, are
you sitting down? $1,750,000 PLUS a new motor home. Winnebago actually
changed their manuals as a result of this suit, just in case Mrs. Grazinski
has any relatives who might also buy a motor home.
 
Sponsored Links
Still scratching my head over why someone can't give a part no. of a simple pre-calibrated fan control pcb. for a stoves cooker.

Madness. :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
 
Sponsored Links
The motor home one was doing the rounds a few years ago but it was a bloke who went back to make a bacon sandwich.
Seems like urban legends to me.
 
The motor home one was doing the rounds a few years ago but it was a bloke who went back to make a bacon sandwich.
Seems like urban legends to me.

i feel the same about the motorhome one, but you never know, but mcdonalds getting sued for their coffee burning some mad bint i think is true, now the lids have "warning, contents may be hot" i mean do we need that kind of warning to cover the % of idiots that knock about the place
 
Story from Pat Kennett (Automotive writer and editor of Truck magazine at one point) about when he worked for Austin in India.
Austin at the time were selling cars in India and in the handbook it said with new cars to "drain the oil after 3000 miles" . The figure may not be correct what with memory and all that but this is exactly what people did, they drained the oil and carried on driving. It said nothing about replacing the oil and resulted in seized Austin engines forcing a reprint :eek:
 
Some very daft ones, as a consequence of laws like "joint and several liability". Which basically is intended to ensure that the aggrieved or injured party gets their full dues, even if some of the negligent parties can't pay. Sounds good in principle - injured gets their money. In practice though, the money comes from the one with the deepest pockets, even if they did bugger all wrong, in comparison to the other defendants. Hence....

A man drove into his fiancé while riding bumper cars at Disney World. The injured woman sued both her fiancé and the company. A jury found the woman 14 percent at fault, her fiancé 85 percent at fault and Disney, one percent liable. At the trial, Florida's spousal tort immunity law prevented the woman from seeking any award from her-now-husband. Thus, although Disney was deemed one percent at fault, the company had to pay 86 percent of the judgment.

Which amounted to a lot of money - Disney were deemed only 1% at fault, but basically coughed up the lot.
 
Some very daft ones, as a consequence of laws like "joint and several liability".

We have that here too.

The US civil court system is very poorly understood in the UK, it's actually far superior to ours. Now that is a lot to do with ours being particularly bad, but we could learn a lot off the Yanks on how to get justice for the injured party in the civil courts.

Though certainly they go after the ones with the deepest pockets i.e. highest insurance cover.

They have punitive damages usually allowed where we generally don't and that's where all the headlines of huge payouts come in. That's because our system was designed to protect the 'great and the good', not the man in the street. So if a company acts appalingly they don't get punished, they get away with behaving badly and know it. Not in the States.

Their awards are set by the jury (you and me, not some stuck up judge with no clue of how the common man lives) who can be a funny bunch and they do tend to punish insurance companys. But that's because they have mostly all been treated badly by insurance companys and they like to payback.

Over here, if you break your leg in an accident and sue, your lawyer could easily make more money than you get awarded. Again, the system looks after the great and the good (lawyers being members of that).

Neither system is perfect but we have more to learn from them than they do from us.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top