Are you being serious.
The new leader of the SNP is ...
- Thread starter diy_fun_uk
- Start date
Sponsored Links
About my opinion? Deadly.
You come across on here as a big fan. Any normal person would see him as a murderous megalomaniac dictator. He murders or poisons his opponents, murders or invades his neighbours and even murders people on UK soil. Yet there's vinty always ready to blow his horn.
Stop exaggerating.
...mostly ready to blow his horn then.
Sponsored Links
Less of the double entendre's please.
Humza is a racist, he played the race card in his speech at Holyrood when he said that there were too many white people in top jobs in Scotland.
He also pulled the race card with his discrimination case when he claimed his children weren't being accepted to a nursery because of their colour.
Does he not know that Scotland is a country populated predominately by white people?
Kate Forbes was attacked for her membership of the Free Church of Scotland but accepted Humza having a Muslim prayer meeting in Bute House, the official residence of the FM.
He has a chip on his shoulder which, he will probably overplay thereby alienating himself from his own party.
He also pulled the race card with his discrimination case when he claimed his children weren't being accepted to a nursery because of their colour.
Does he not know that Scotland is a country populated predominately by white people?
Kate Forbes was attacked for her membership of the Free Church of Scotland but accepted Humza having a Muslim prayer meeting in Bute House, the official residence of the FM.
He has a chip on his shoulder which, he will probably overplay thereby alienating himself from his own party.
Just like South Africa after 1994. Affirmative Action required standards to be lowered to artificially level the playing field. We now see the result in SA with basket case economy, crime so bad it's like a minor civil war raging and rolling power cuts because the grid can't cope any more. Of course this disaster is downplayed by the media. I have flown SA Airways pre and post 94. The standards after 94 had dropped significantly. Just one example, but at least boxes were being ticked. What's happening in UK is just a much slower, lower level of what happened to SA. No less destructive though.
Last edited:
Would you have preferred apartheid had continued instead?
Immediately after, crime rocketed, the economy tanked and the Rand's value halved. It's now worth much less than a quarter of it's early 90s value. It's continued to get much worse. Murders and rape figures are among the worst in the World. The infrastructure is falling apart and all institutions are riddled with corruption and incompetence. Unemployment and economic inequality has increased a lot. They can't even keep the lights on, resorting to what they euphamistically call 'load shedding' - power cuts which affect most areas for hours every day. Most who can leave have left.
So yes, by any measure, it was far better for whites and blacks in SA pre-94 under minority rule (one of the few times I actually champion minorities). Same with Rhodesia when Ian Smith was in charge. But these inconvenient truths must be surpressed.
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
