Your advice very much appreciated.
They provide additional space heating over what you might already have. The room is definitely colder when it is not on.
They add a level of comfort when you walk in and it would other wise be cold.
The rate at which water evaporates on a floor is temperature dependent. Therefore the floor will dry faster if there is underfloor heating and this is turned on.
The amount of solid matter in solution in your water is not affected by underfloor heating. If there is 'limescale' in your water, that water is on your floor, and that water evaporates, it will come out of solution and leave a mark on your floor. This is true whether you have underfloor heating or not.
They are very expensive to run, relatively. For the few minutes a day you use it I think it extravagant, just my opinion.
I always turn it off when the mrs is away on business and it doesn't bother me one jot. However the room is definitely colder, so I wear a robe and a pair of slippers.
The mrs always turns it back on when she gets home as not having it bothers her immensely.
I don't make an issue of it.
If it's an upstairs bathroom with tiles on timber or ply I believe they say you should limit the heat output to 100w / m2. You should probably use tilebacker board or something similar in any event and you can increase the heat ouput per m2 if you do.
So, in my opinion, nice to have but an expensive luxury. If you don't have it you will need a larger radiator.
From what I can tell, it's the control mechanism which you need to look at, the cables are much the same. To get a larger heat ouput per square metre you put them closer together.
If you have sufficient output per square meter and sufficient insulation then it will be all the heating you require to keep the room warm. This is how underfloor heating works in the rest of your house, your bathroom is not an exception. It will be expensive.