True - but, more to the point, it would not say "IΔn = 0.03A" !I think its an RCBO too. For me, the giveaway is the C16 - suggesting a 16A over current trip rating device with a type 'C' tripping curve. If it were juts an RCD , there would be no need for the C in front of the 16
True - but, more to the point, it would not say "IΔn = 0.03A" !
Sorry, I thought that, since you said the 'giveaway' was the "C16", I thought you were implying that it might just be an MCB - but, on re-reading what you wrote, I see that wasn't the case.???? Why would it not say "IΔn = 0.03A" ?? That's the differential trip rating of 30mA. Surely if it where just an RCD it would only give a "IΔn" rating.
It's a Type AC, which has been obsolete since last year as far as the UK is concerned, and a couple of decades for most other countries.Is it safe, though, or should I replace it with a more modern one (the van is 18 years old and fitted out in Italy)
No? .......and no one has mentioned the pictogram
The numbers and diagrams on the front of the unit also seem consistent with a RCBO..
Aaah, missed that.No? ....
Kind Regards, John
No problem - we all miss lots of things!Aaah, missed that. Sorry Plugwash.
Quite so. As should have been apparent from what I wrote, I, for one, never had any 'uncertainty' for you to question. As plugwash said, either the markings or the 'pictogram' were enough to create 'certainty'- at least in my mind!I think I was mainly questioning the uncertainty, when the pictogram shows the overload protection on the live, and the differential detection around live and neutral.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local