They make a lovely couple.
no it is notLEST WE FORGET, this is what it's all about:
Tommys mothers family were good Irish Catholics from the Irish Republic, you don't crap on your own doorstep.Yaxley-Lennon is not concerned about sexual abuse.
His only exploits that as an excuse to demonstrate his racist attitude.
If he was concerned about sexual abuse, he would also be campaigning about other issues, such as this:
"In August 2018, a list was published which revealed that over 1,300 Catholic clergy in Ireland had been accused of sexual abuse, with 82 of them getting convicted"And this
"Scouting Ireland, Catholic Boy Scouts of Ireland covered up sex abuse committed by people who served in the organization"And this
United KingdomThe fact that he chooses to highlight only certain offences, offences that are far more prevalent than his apparent concern, while choosing to ignore others proves that he is a racist masquerading as a social justice activist.
England
"Archdiocese of Birmingham"
"Diocese of Shrewsbury"
etc.
Scotland
etc
Wales
etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cases_by_country
I'm asking about the kid who was stabbed and burned to death. Sorry I wasn't clear (and off topic).
So it's a diversionary smokescreen as well?Tommys mothers family were good Irish Catholics from the Irish Republic, you don't crap on your own doorstep.
no it is not
Tommy Robinson is not some saint going around highlighting crimes of Ethnic people, his purpose is to make money.
same as Katie Hopkins
but you fall for it.
Disgusting - I'd want to have a word. I'd be careful though if I was one arrest away from going back to prison. Yax claims he was spat toward, lol. That's why you'd find no evidence especially on his clothing.What would you do if someone came up and spat a load of phlegm in your face
Alleged. Yax now claims he's a journalist. Not a very good one though, nor are his fact checkers..He was in Barrow covering a story about the sexual abuse of a young girl
It was covered in The GuardianSo, tell me then guys.
What would you do if someone came up and spat a load of phlegm in your face?
Perhaps you'd just walk off crying?
Would none of you even consider putting the person that assaulted you on the floor?
Of course not, you'd rather just bitch about things on here from behind your keyboards.
He was in Barrow covering a story about the sexual abuse of a young girl, and no you wont have heard of it because the mass media, your newspapers, the mail, the sun, the guardian etc. do not cover those stories.
But don't let that stop you.
What would you do if someone came up and spat a load of phlegm in your face?
News reports could be inaccurate though. If someone spat in his face then he has the right to defend himself. Fakking disgusting no matter who you are.He's less trustworthy than Farage or bungling Boris!
I can't think of a single example of when news reports have been inaccurate.News reports could be inaccurate though.
Oh god, he's not involved in that mess?It was covered in The Guardian