Circumsion on the NHS?

diane1 · Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:38 pm

conny wrote:

You seem a natural my dear, no trying involved.

....a natural what tho.....???

conny · Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:40 pm

Why Lady of course!

What else could I mean?

Mickymoody · Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:58 am

If this practice is the norm in some cultures, then why has it been adopted by others? (Apart from the female mutilation) ?

I have a complete misunderstanding regarding this; but I've found that circumsised friends have a tendancy (not that friendly with them!); to often seek out and sleep with a lot of women, whereas the opposite tend to have long term relationships with women? i.e trying to reclaim a part of them? The circumsised ones.

Why even do that? What purpose does it serve?

Nige F · Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:54 am

Mickymoody wrote:

but I've found that circumsised friends have a tendancy ; to often seek out and sleep with a lot of women, whereas the opposite tend to have long term relationships with women?
Why even do that? What purpose does it serve?

It`s historical - During the Civil War , under Cromwell and the Roundheads the men were promiscuous . The Cavaliers , on the other hand , were Chivalric and monagamous

1john · Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:19 am

So every circumsized man is always balls deep in a different lady??

holmslaw · Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:50 pm

ColJack wrote:

again, cobblers..

HIV is transmitted via exchange of bodily fluids.. skin to skin contact doesn't do it.

Have a look at this http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/6176209.stm

joinerjohn · Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:02 pm

holmslaw wrote:

ColJack wrote:

again, cobblers..

HIV is transmitted via exchange of bodily fluids.. skin to skin contact doesn't do it.

Have a look at this http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/6176209.stm

Holmslaw,,, Did you notice the name of the Doctor who is the director of the HIV/Aids department of the World Health Organization, you gave the link to??
Thought not.

holmslaw · Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:18 pm

Ha, Ha, Ha, apparently his wifes name is f.a.n.n.y.

daneski88 · Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:36 pm

holmslaw wrote:

ColJack wrote:

again, cobblers..

HIV is transmitted via exchange of bodily fluids.. skin to skin contact doesn't do it.

Have a look at this http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/6176209.stm

Thanks holmslaw - I thought I had been imagining it for a while there

Joinerjohn - schoolboy humour still exists in your head then. Phwoaar, blimey titter titter

Karinska · Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:41 pm

IMO, where circumcision is performed purely for religious reasons then it should absolutely not be free on the NHS. It should be treated the same as any other form of cosmetic surgery i.e. where the procedure is desired rather than required.

joe-90 · Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:08 pm

What would happen if a parent had their kids ear lobes chopped off as a fashion item?

Karinska · Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:18 pm

joe-90 wrote:

What would happen if a parent had their kids ear lobes chopped off as a fashion item?

Taxi for Joe90

joinerjohn · Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:47 pm

I think the kid would be very unhappy,,, and probably be deaf.

diane1 · Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:02 pm

joinerjohn wrote:

I think the kid would be very unhappy,,, and probably be deaf.

the kid may well be unhappy.....but it wouldnt be deaf....Joe only said chop off the ear LOBES....!! ....

gas112 · Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:11 pm

Knew a kid who was born without eyelids so they used the skin from his circumcision to make some for him.

The operation was a success but left him cock eyed