A
Alarm
For all of the above.
A new theory on 9/11?
- Thread starter ABCwarrior
- Start date
For all of the above.
Sponsored Links
I've been outside all night with a golf club trying to hit a coke can through a steel girder....it'll never happen will it, let alone pass through it and come out the same shape.
Maybe they'll start making aluminium drill bits for drilling steel next, who knows?
Has anyone replicated this remarkable feat of anti-science? I sincerely doubt it? I mean why invest in anti-tank/DU technology(well apart from poisoning your enemy but that's another issue) when you can just use aluminium at 4-500mph, well below the mach 2-3 it takes a missile to bust a tank?
They wouldn't need the lame excuses for the cost etc, just a fraction of the side of the WTC replicated and fully braced against a rock face or something, an old plane of similar size on an auto pilot setting and we''d get the truth alright. But we couln't have that could we?
Maybe they'll start making aluminium drill bits for drilling steel next, who knows?
Has anyone replicated this remarkable feat of anti-science? I sincerely doubt it? I mean why invest in anti-tank/DU technology(well apart from poisoning your enemy but that's another issue) when you can just use aluminium at 4-500mph, well below the mach 2-3 it takes a missile to bust a tank?
They wouldn't need the lame excuses for the cost etc, just a fraction of the side of the WTC replicated and fully braced against a rock face or something, an old plane of similar size on an auto pilot setting and we''d get the truth alright. But we couln't have that could we?
A
Alarm
Your sounding neurotic.
psychotic!!? 
Sponsored Links
Sounding???
J
joinerjohn
Have any experiments been done to show the effects of a slug of Aluminium/Titanium, alloy colliding with a piece of steel 3/4" thick at approx 600mph?. In fact, I'd like to see the proof of any experiments that show an aircraft colliding with a 110 storey building at that speed.
(sorry I forgot, we have all seen the results on TV a million times, in slo mo (also showing the missile launched at the last millisecond) and the lack of windows on a passenger aircraft, and the strange bulbous piece on the bottom of a passenger aircraft, and the dubious footage supposedly superimposed on the screen to fool us all into believing a passenger aircraft did hit the towers. We've been bombarded with theories from, heat waves (which melt steel) through to nuclear explosions underground (which demolish buildings, but produce no radiation)
WTF am I supposed to believe???
(sorry I forgot, we have all seen the results on TV a million times, in slo mo (also showing the missile launched at the last millisecond) and the lack of windows on a passenger aircraft, and the strange bulbous piece on the bottom of a passenger aircraft, and the dubious footage supposedly superimposed on the screen to fool us all into believing a passenger aircraft did hit the towers. We've been bombarded with theories from, heat waves (which melt steel) through to nuclear explosions underground (which demolish buildings, but produce no radiation)
WTF am I supposed to believe???
What Wobs tells you obviously JJ, because the government and their associated partners in crime have ALL the official material to work with(well, that which they haven't destroyed), and any reference to anything put up on the net questioning this is clearly CT madness by us mentalists, who obviously need to find evidence to back up any differing views or judgements we can make from what there is out there and what we can see with our own eyes, or else clearly the official line stands....
To even think that NIST were going to do an objective analysis of what happened is f**king hilarious, and to believe the pancake nonsense is even funnier.
It's a good point re materials testing- putting aside building "collapse theory" I would love to see some testing done to shove an ENTIRE jumbo jet through a few dozen(nay hundred if you believe the footage showing it exiting the other side!!) massive steel columns- they know which floors were allegedly hit, so they'll be able to recreate the exact column widths and thickness of steel, and their spacings etc...and until I do see the evidence I'll never believe it possible, especially at subsonic speed(which is analogous to a pensioner denting your car in Morrisons car park rather than a high speed collision...)
But if a test of this nature couldn't come up with the goods then.....whoa, the whole story unravels completely, and therefore it's unlikely to ever be conducted is it? Bunch of hocus pocus video trickery....
Next you'll be telling us it was Lee Harvey Oswald who shot JFK, we have been to the moon(in a tinfoil landing craft, never mind tinfoil hats!), and Obama really is in charge of the USA....
To even think that NIST were going to do an objective analysis of what happened is f**king hilarious, and to believe the pancake nonsense is even funnier.
It's a good point re materials testing- putting aside building "collapse theory" I would love to see some testing done to shove an ENTIRE jumbo jet through a few dozen(nay hundred if you believe the footage showing it exiting the other side!!) massive steel columns- they know which floors were allegedly hit, so they'll be able to recreate the exact column widths and thickness of steel, and their spacings etc...and until I do see the evidence I'll never believe it possible, especially at subsonic speed(which is analogous to a pensioner denting your car in Morrisons car park rather than a high speed collision...)
But if a test of this nature couldn't come up with the goods then.....whoa, the whole story unravels completely, and therefore it's unlikely to ever be conducted is it? Bunch of hocus pocus video trickery....
Next you'll be telling us it was Lee Harvey Oswald who shot JFK, we have been to the moon(in a tinfoil landing craft, never mind tinfoil hats!), and Obama really is in charge of the USA....
Wrong again. But I'm sure you'll have no problem showing some evidence to support this wrongness you claim.
However, here's a nice piccy of the route a missile would have to take to take out the lamposts that were knocked over:
Yellow dots are the lamp posts.
Aside from the fact that no one reported a missile, and everyone who saw the plane, said they saw a plane, it took out a number of lamp posts along the way. I know of no missile that could have made that move.
Read this then Wobs, there's no doubt that 5 lamp posts were downed, but not by a 757 on its way into the Pentagon....
http://www.odeion.org/cruisemissile/
But maybe this may be worth watching for those who've fallen out of a boat in Egypt:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGbEJ3pXwWM
http://www.odeion.org/cruisemissile/
But maybe this may be worth watching for those who've fallen out of a boat in Egypt:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGbEJ3pXwWM
Occams Razor, well obviously that's got to be the answer eh? Brilliant....
Here is the actual analysis report from the FDR:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc02.pdf
Page 5 confirms what I have shown with a map of the flight.
Full findings here:
http://www.911myths.com/AAL77_fdr.pdf
Your link claims the plane was in a different path than the posts were in, but this fails to account for things like:
Inaccuracies in the system
Inaccuracies caused by exceptional conditions
Combining physical evidence (lamp posts, wreckage etc), eye witness accounts, and the FDR, it brings us to the conclusion that it did what has been claimed.
It must be awful to be so wrong.
It must be awful having so much sand in your ears and a sore back. It must be truly awful to be so naive you believe every piece of sh*te our governments fabricate to con the public into backing so many terrible deeds done in our name....
Sponsored Links
