A new theory on 9/11?

Joined
27 Jun 2010
Messages
653
Reaction score
55
Location
Invernesshire
Country
United Kingdom
Well, it is to me- ex Soviet Military Nuclear Specialist Dimitri Khalezov has compelling knowledge as to exactly how the towers were brought down, and knows EXACTLY what missile hit the Pentagon...

It's in 2 parts, 4hrs long, but well worth watching IMHO. Must have something going for it if You Tube keep repeatedly removing it for no good reason!

Part 1- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNuKAdGlxFo&feature=fvsr

Part 2- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c39O-ftZboU&feature=related

If you don't have time to watch it then don't waste your precious time slagging it off either ;)
 
Sponsored Links
Why not when you watch these jot down the time lines of the interesting bits.
That way you will get more responses.

Just a suggestion.
 
Would do Alarm but it's a bit distracting tbh, thing is with this one is there's very little that's been covered before under the usual controlled demolition stuff. It's not the "bin Laden mini-nukes" red herring either, it's a full on (3x) 150kt nuke well below the buildings...
 
Sponsored Links
If you don't have time to watch it then don't waste your precious time slagging it off either ;)
But you don't wish/can't explain the salient points to justify people losing (read wasting) 4 hours of their life.
 
I watched these months ago and I must say some of the evidence does not match the evidence given by official sources. Three things need to be satisfactorily answered which have not been to date. No 1 , why did the BBC report the collapse of I believe building 7, way before it actualy happened?. Why did building 7 collapse when it was a long way from the twin towers? , and why was the 'hole'in the Pentagon not consistant with a plane , but more like a missile?. I don't believe the government organised this as a means to invade Iraq for the simple reason if they had been found out..........well !!!!
But there seems to be a lot of unanswered questions. At the end of the day , a lot of innocent people lost their lives , and it undoubtedly changed the way we all think. I sincerely hope it never happens again to any Nation
 
Why do people have a such a big issue with the fact that Bin Liner organised for a couple of morons to hijack a plane and slam it into a building? Further, that that form of impact was never calculated during the design/engineering of the buildings?

This must have been a right little earner for all the the conspiracy theory feeders.
 
Why do people have a such a big issue with the fact that Bin Liner organised for a couple of morons to hijack a plane and slam it into a building? Further, that that form of impact was never calculated during the design/engineering of the buildings?

This must have been a right little earner for all the the conspiracy theory feeders.

It has never been proved that Bin Laden was behind the attacks. And it would take more than a "moron" to hijack a plane. You are obviously one of these sad individuals who watch the news and believe all they see and hear.
 
Main points? And how do I do that objectively with 4hrs of film to watch? There was radiation poisoning according to him, not acute but chronic, and that's what's been covered up as a form of "ground zero syndrome".
But an airburst and an underground detonation produce very different results according to him(ie no thermal radiation/blast wave or x-ray burst in the latter)
(There's a funny one too- what's the pre and post 9/11 definition of "ground zero"? go look it up)
He's an ex Soviet expert, think they know a fair bit on radiation poisoning maybe?
Why do people have a such a big issue with the fact that Bin Liner organised for a couple of morons to hijack a plane and slam it into a building? Further, that that form of impact was never calculated during the design/engineering of the buildings?
Because nothing in that paragraph is true....?(and many of the 19 "morons" were alive and well after it, but lets not get bogged down in the detail :rolleyes:)
 
many of the 19 "morons" were alive and well after it, but lets not get bogged down in the detail :rolleyes:)
Quite the contrary, lets. Shall we start with how these 'suicide' morons are still alive, where they are now and how and where you came up with that information?
 
Oh dear, here we go again.
Only the conspiracy theorists must be telling the truth and the state must be an enemy of the people.

Next you'll be telling us all the Tony Blair never told a porkie - and look at the mess he's caused across the middle east.
 
But you don't wish/can't explain the salient points to justify people losing (read wasting) 4 hours of their life

As opposed to wasting it posting comments on a DIY forum about nothing to do with DIY, or having nothing worthwhile or constructive to post when you do, just the usual negative put-downs so many here seem so adept at.....?
 
It has never been proved that Bin Laden was behind the attacks.
We'll disregard his video in which he claimed responsibility then shall we?

And it would take more than a "moron" to hijack a plane.
How do you know? Have you ever hijacked a plane? Had experience of Special Forces? Had flying lessons?

You are obviously one of these sad individuals who watch the news and believe all they see and hear.
I worked for 'the news' sunshine so I've got an inkling as to how it works.
 
But you don't wish/can't explain the salient points to justify people losing (read wasting) 4 hours of their life

As opposed to wasting it posting comments on a DIY forum about nothing to do with DIY, or having nothing worthwhile or constructive to post when you do, just the usual negative put-downs so many here seem so adept at.....?
And you consider your post worthwhile?

Are we not allowed to think otherwise?
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top