As apparently you will soon be 'whitey'Thankfully, I think you're in the minority, Elly.
That is according to the 'ubermensch' on here of course
As apparently you will soon be 'whitey'Thankfully, I think you're in the minority, Elly.
I happened to live in a city for some time where dogs (apart from the ones I described) were banned...
It was a brilliant place -
So you can stick your 'free country and a nation of animal lovers' up your a*se
Why not move back there? You're clearly selling yourself short by staying where you are now. Which city was that?
Why not move back there? You're clearly selling yourself short by staying where you are now. Which city was that?
Mecca...
I thought the idea (in the link) was to try and prevent deaths, i.e. shut the gate before the horse etc?If a dog injures, maims or kills a child - or anyone for that matter - the owner should be charged accordingly: grievous bodily harm or manslaughter.
It's a pretty sh itty world that accepts the preventable deaths of children in view that "oh we can prosecute the dog owners after they kill a child".
As you know it's not possible but surely there should be control over dangerous dogs?Why not ban everything that's harmful to us humans
Why not ban children?
No more expensive child support.
No screaming, badly behaved, smelly things in pubs/restaurants/stores/the street/on buses/on trains/etc.
No s nappies dumped on the side of the road/in rubbish bins/in car parks/parks/etc.
Nothing for the dogs to bite either - no that the problem is with the dog, it's with the owners.
PW