Miss Shaw was mopping up the water and had texted her partner to come home telling him the hall was flooded and the "electricity was sparking".
This was without question a case where an RCD would have prevented the death, however also education would have also prevented the death clearly when it is sparking you don't mop up the water step one should have been turn off power.
The case is well documented and it seems it was due to a whole list of failures.
1) Excess cable left inside stud wall.
2) No safety cut out on immersion heater thermostat.
3) Glue missed from the pipe work of overpressure overflow tun dish.
4) Lack of care when plaster fitted the plaster boards.
5) Use of semi skilled labour.
6) Poor advice given to semi skilled labourer when he found a fault.
The list goes on. We see reference to road safety fitting a 30 mA RCD is like putting up a 30 MPH speed limit when it was 50 after an accident where the driver was doing 90 MPH. OK the death would have been prevented by a 30 mA at 40 ms RCD however if the rest of the checks had been done including a proper inspection and test before energising these would have also prevented the death.
So to nitty gritty the death would have been prevented by correctly doing the inspection and testing. And fitting a RCD would only help if it worked and since the rest was not inspected and tested correctly we must assume the RCD would also not be inspected and tested so could have failed to protect in exactly the same way as the earth bonding failed to protect. It could have been faulty.
Even a 5 year old child can be trained not to run out into the road. With the extra 4 years training moving from leaving school at 14 to leaving at 18 if the schools can't educate people not to work around sparking items and instead to switch off power first then it's rather a poor show for the schools. I still can't believe in this day and age that children are not taught the basics at school. They still leave rural schools without a driving licence.