African American

It's the genre, not the colour of skin of performer that is honoured. :rolleyes:


No - it is the performer who is honoured (that is how Joss Stone, if memory serves), managed to "win" a MOBO award.
:rolleyes: She wouldn't have been nominated if she'd performed some classical music. :rolleyes:
Being a soul singer, it's hardly likely that she would have been singing some classical number. :rolleyes:

[/quote]


"She wouldn't have been nominated if..........."

She.

You've torpedo'ed your own statement, right there.


"MOBO Award winner, Joss Stone!", not


"MOBO Award winner, some more music of black origin! (performed by some Cornish bird who's name is of no consequence". I don't recall hearing anything like that.


Here - have some rolly eyes ;)

:rolleyes:
 
Sponsored Links
You don't need to be white to be a racist.

Thank you Nosey. It seems you can see a slightly bigger picture, unlike your dropclanger friend who can only hurl abuse when he/she is cornered.
 
If MOBO doesn't stand for music of purely black origin, why is it called that?
You are pathetic sometimes, squeaky.
It isn't called music of purely black origin!
Why isn't it called Music Of mainly black origin with some white in there and maybe a bit of yellow?
Yeah that'll work MOMBO - music of mainly black origin. :rolleyes:
Ah yes, yellow, can you imagine if there was a yellow music awards? Or why isn't it just called the Music Awards?
MAMBOWABOWOY. :eek: Music of mainly black origin with a bit of white or yellow.
You are a clown, squeaky!
Or MA - Music Awards, what type of music? :confused:
How about MAMA - Mnet Asian Music Awards (look it up)

You still confuse colour with countries and will never see the difference. Chinese food is from China, not Yellowland. It is not food of yellow origin.
You're trying to draw a distinction where there is none and you'll never understand why. :rolleyes:

Why are things categorised according to one's skin colour and not their talent? Is that not racist in itself?
.
It's the genre, not the colour of skin of performer that is honoured. :rolleyes:

It s sad that your uber intelligence doesn't run to answering a question in a serious manner. Do you have a script to work to or do you just make the insults up yourself? I really did try to give you a chance to answer properly but knew you wouldn't be able to.

What you fail to see is that the ramblings of yourself and others of your ilk, is partly why racism exists.
 
Sponsored Links
It's the genre, not the colour of skin of performer that is honoured. :rolleyes:


No - it is the performer who is honoured (that is how Joss Stone, if memory serves), managed to "win" a MOBO award.
:rolleyes: She wouldn't have been nominated if she'd performed some classical music. :rolleyes:
Being a soul singer, it's hardly likely that she would have been singing some classical number. :rolleyes:


"She wouldn't have been nominated if..........."

She.

You've torpedo'ed your own statement, right there.


"MOBO Award winner, Joss Stone!", not


"MOBO Award winner, some more music of black origin! (performed by some Cornish bird who's name is of no consequence". I don't recall hearing anything like that.


Here - have some rolly eyes ;)

:rolleyes:
Sorry Brigadier, your message is too obscure to understand. Must be that Christmas spirit that you've started already. :rolleyes:

If you're suggesting that she was nominated as some token representative, you're way off the mark. It's the genre of her music that decides whether she is elligible or not, not the colour of her skin. :rolleyes:

If you're suggesting that she was nominated, not her music, well someone has to perform it, it doesn't perform itself. Some artists perfom music better than others. Therefore someone wins, and their skin colour is immaterial. Simple init? :rolleyes:
 
It s sad that your uber intelligence doesn't run to answering a question in a serious manner. Do you have a script to work to or do you just make the insults up yourself? I really did try to give you a chance to answer properly but knew you wouldn't be able to.

What you fail to see is that the ramblings of yourself and others of your ilk, is partly why racism exists.
What you really mean is that you don't like my answers. :LOL: :LOL:
Or it's my fault that you're a racist. :LOL: :LOL:

I really did try to give you a chance to answer properly but knew you wouldn't be able to.
I told you, you were prejudiced. :LOL: :LOL:
 
The sad thing is that prejudice isn't heriditary, but it is taught at a vey early age by the parents. So, one could say that about the posters who are prejudiced, that it's not their fault. They've been socialised into that psyche from a very early age in their family upbringing.

I'm glad that you lefties admit this, because indoctrinating the young with lefty clap trap is all part of your plan. Catch them young, ideally dressing it up as education, you can prevent then from thinking for themselves and forming their own opinions and natural conclusions. Because, 9 times out of ten, the conclusions will inevitably be what the 'lefty who know what's best for us' brigade won't want or like. The tyranny of multiculturalism can be implanted into young malleable minds, so that they almost celebrate the fact that their country has been given away and trashed for ever. They can also be primed to shout down anyone who dares question this with the 'R' word. Perish the thought that their parents may know better, because their parents will know how things were, and what has been lost.

As for being prejudiced, it's just natural human nature to be discerning about invasions of your territory, especially by less advanced, more aggressive and culturally inferior peoples. You lefty, diversity-peddlers dress this up by lying that it brings advantages to the host population. However, you can never say convincingly what these 'advantages' actually are. You just try to close the arguments down with the same tired, predictable words.
 
OK, so I'm gonna sit on the fence here and I'm setting light to my nether regions agreeing with the reindeer etc, but I do not find the MOBO''s racist.
In fact, if it weren't for the Blues, perhaps artists such as Clapton, The Beatles, Rolling Stones etc would never have come to fruition.
What I do object to is, as stated previously, The Black Policeman Association etc. It would be deemed racist if it were White only Policeman etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origins_of_the_blues
 
You just try to close the arguments down with the same tired, predictable words.
So says the man who always assumes that people who oppose racism or sexism etc are politically motivated.

Lefty this, lefty that, blah blah blah. Has it occurred to you that people may find things distasteful because they are distasteful and not because of some political leanings?

Not only are you very naive but are cowardly in your extremism because you hide behind your tainted politics. Try and think like a human being, it's quite refreshing.
 
You just try to close the arguments down with the same tired, predictable words.
So says the man who always assumes that people who oppose racism or sexism etc are politically motivated.

Lefty this, lefty that, blah blah blah. Has it occurred to you that people may find things distasteful because they are distasteful and not because of some political leanings?

Not only are you very naive but are cowardly in your extremism because you hide behind your tainted politics. Try and think like a human being, it's quite refreshing.
Your diatribe does you no favours. Just because another persons views on racism are different to yours, doesn't mean that they are wrong.
Would you have Romas living next door to you? Afterall, their reputation goes before them.
 
You just try to close the arguments down with the same tired, predictable words.
So says the man who always assumes that people who oppose racism or sexism etc are politically motivated.

Lefty this, lefty that, blah blah blah. Has it occurred to you that people may find things distasteful because they are distasteful and not because of some political leanings?

Not only are you very naive but are cowardly in your extremism because you hide behind your tainted politics. Try and think like a human being, it's quite refreshing.

:rolleyes:

Hardly surprising that you want to shoot down the messenger, when you don't really understand the whole picture and are unable to foresee what's coming.
 
Your diatribe does you no favours.
nor do I require any.

Just because another persons views on racism are different to yours, doesn't mean that they are wrong.
Eh? If I find someone or something abhorrent then I will say so. What do you mean by right or wrong?

Would you have Romas living next door to you? Afterall, their reputation goes before them.
I wouldn't want to live next door to anyone antisocial. Good enough?
 
You just try to close the arguments down with the same tired, predictable words.
So says the man who always assumes that people who oppose racism or sexism etc are politically motivated.

Lefty this, lefty that, blah blah blah. Has it occurred to you that people may find things distasteful because they are distasteful and not because of some political leanings?

Not only are you very naive but are cowardly in your extremism because you hide behind your tainted politics. Try and think like a human being, it's quite refreshing.

Anyway. Forget the hysterics and demonstrate to me what parts of my post you don't completely understand, and which parts you think are untrue.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top