|
|
| Author |
Message |
dazzler39

Joined: 28 Oct 2009 Posts: 59 Location: United Kingdom Thanked: 5 times
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:33 pm |
|
|
can anyone confirm whether i can class a Baxi Bermuda Backboiler o/f with flue liner in chimney a/r under t.b008, or not, also a worcester 240 combi o/f with concealed vertical flue , cheers, Darren |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
If you do not want to see this advert, click here to login or if you are new click here to join free. |
 |
expertgasman

Joined: 16 Aug 2010 Posts: 2164 Location: Cleveland, United Kingdom Thanked: 273 times
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:42 pm |
|
|
N0. This only applies to room sealed. Currently.
Ps. Why would you be so keen to do so? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
 |
Nige F

Joined: 28 Jun 2005 Posts: 15463 Location: United Kingdom Thanked: 716 times
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:52 pm |
|
|
To the Combustion Chamber with you  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
 |
dazzler39

Joined: 28 Oct 2009 Posts: 59 Location: United Kingdom Thanked: 5 times
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:52 pm |
|
|
Jjust did gas safety on both, baxi operating no problem, no issues, just was aware of flues in voids regs and wondered if this came under those regs, also the worcester 240 was not working so i a.r because i couldnt check safe operation, but the flue disappears vertically into void with absolutely no means of inspecting it, doesnt that come under flues in voids reg? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
 |
expertgasman

Joined: 16 Aug 2010 Posts: 2164 Location: Cleveland, United Kingdom Thanked: 273 times
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:08 pm |
|
|
but the flue disappears vertically into void with absolutely no means of inspecting it, doesn't that come under flues in voids reg?[/quote]
Not speifically under TB008. Whether you think it right or wrong, there are loads of non visible flues in voids including many selkirk type flues passing through boxed in voids in bedrooms.
I suspect that this will change, hence my comment : Currently.
I suppose the thinking is that a small opening in a flue is likely to entrail air INTO the flue, rather than let fumes out, whereas a fanned system is under more internal pressure and will surely leak through even a small gap. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
 |
onlyfitidealboilers

Joined: 11 Jan 2010 Posts: 1569 Location: Aberdeen, United Kingdom Thanked: 97 times
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:40 pm |
|
|
Apart from a flue liner/ back boiler etc. any flue that you can not inspect throughout its length is At risk. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
 |
adlplumbing

Joined: 09 Dec 2009 Posts: 4012 Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom Thanked: 292 times
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:52 pm |
|
|
actualy heres one for the mix and i will say it as alowed as manufactirs mi say so
but the new baxi back boiler unit it room sealed and fan flued |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
 |
simond

Joined: 26 Oct 2004 Posts: 3980 Location: Surrey, United Kingdom Thanked: 257 times
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:10 pm |
|
|
The TB008 is pitched where the air inlet and outlet are in the same piece of flue. In this scenario, the flue coming apart would result in almost total rebreathing of the products of combustion.
Therefore, in a typical condensing boiler concentric flue in a void, you could go from a normal reading of say 100 parts per million carbon monoxide coming out of the exhaust, to 10,000ppm or worse if it comes apart. Death is almost guaranteed, and an incorrectly supported or fixed flue could come apart undetected by the occupier.
Take the open flue, if there is a leak, CO is released into the surrounding area, but can be expected to be much lower concentrations within a chimney or void, because the air inlet is not likely to be vitiated.
I don't imagine there will be a retrospective directive on open flued appliances, because the implications, whilst certainly dangerous, do not carry the same fatal guarantee as a concentric failure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
expertgasman

Joined: 16 Aug 2010 Posts: 2164 Location: Cleveland, United Kingdom Thanked: 273 times
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 7:41 pm |
|
|
| onlyfitidealboilers wrote: | | Apart from a flue liner/ back boiler etc. any flue that you can not inspect throughout its length is At risk. |
Is that so? I don't think so, but am always prepared to be corrected. can you point us to where the procedures says this is so? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
 |
onlyfitidealboilers

Joined: 11 Jan 2010 Posts: 1569 Location: Aberdeen, United Kingdom Thanked: 97 times
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 7:50 pm |
|
|
Just what iv had off gas safe, makes sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
 |
transam

Joined: 20 Nov 2009 Posts: 6185 Location: Surrey, United Kingdom Thanked: 729 times
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 8:06 pm |
|
|
As I see it any flue with joints that cannot be visually inspected , any open flued boiler would need to be smoke tested if you have X amount of joints lengths of flue pipe built into the infrastructure of the building how would one know they are sound ?? flue liner should be a continous length with in chimney !
Although in many cases one joint may well never be visable were the copex connects to the rigid flue pipe ect , same as some fanned flued steamers that use specific liners , eg Atmos & there flue liner system
(Maybe ?) IMO ect ect |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
 |
expertgasman

Joined: 16 Aug 2010 Posts: 2164 Location: Cleveland, United Kingdom Thanked: 273 times
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 8:22 pm |
|
|
I don't disagree that being visible makes sense, or that concealed is a bad idea, but the fact is there are many, many like this and have been fitted as so for years
I haven't seen anything to say that this is automattically officially classed as AR, but equally, I'm sure there are some dodgy concealed joints somewhere. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
 |
mickyg

Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Posts: 13797 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom Thanked: 2318 times
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 9:29 pm |
|
|
| onlyfitidealboilers wrote: | | Apart from a flue liner/ back boiler etc. any flue that you can not inspect throughout its length is At risk. |
incorrect, the TB is only relevant for room sealed fan flued appliances. Open flues are not affected. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
 |
onlyfitidealboilers

Joined: 11 Jan 2010 Posts: 1569 Location: Aberdeen, United Kingdom Thanked: 97 times
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
 |
picasso

Joined: 08 Apr 2008 Posts: 4268 Location: Essex, United Kingdom Thanked: 790 times
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:48 am |
|
|
flues in voids are not at risk until 31 dec 2012, then if no inspection hatches are fitted by that date you can switch the appliance off and label, at the moment they are suggesting co detectors and other safety checks ? whatever they might be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|