Hate Crime

[Roy Bloom]

He def is

Woman’s rights

the fruit cake has made excuses on the way woman are treated by the mad mullers and tally ban

He supports there behaviour / cruelty towards woman and young girls

Word for word You’ve posted probably more than the rest combined. And not made a single point.

And got the previous thread closed.

Beauty salons closed
Girls denied education
Woman denied jobs
Woman denied access to free spaces

Woman denied representation

( Afghanistan 2023) r oy / dazzler

I see you are both intent on getting this thread closed as well.
Instead of participating with intelligent contributions, you seek to have the thread closed.
Is that because it's beyond your intellectual capability?

 

[nwgs]

Most of my opinions, comments and claims have been supported with evidence, research, studies and articles.

Perhaps you'd like to review the thread, see if anyone else presented any evidence or research to support their claims.


If I recall correctly, you were boastimg about "having the final say".
Yes, it was you, you had the final 3 or 4 'says'.
View attachment 313376

You’ve supported nothing and no one has agreed with a single post!

Even the wombels aren’t onboard.

 

[nwgs]

I see you are both intent on getting this thread closed as well.
Instead of participating with intelligent contributions, you seek to have the thread closed.
Is that because it's beyond your intellectual capability?

No I’m just pointing out that you ramble on more than the rest of us combined. And not a single person has yet to agree.

 

[Roy Bloom]

Most of my opinions, comments and claims have been supported with evidence, research, studies and articles.

As I thought, apart from the plethora of articles, studies, research papers, and real life data that I have presented in support of my arguments, there have been about eigth or nine other instances of links to other articles, posted by about six posters. None of which was JohnD's, he presented nothing but slogans and disingenuous assumptions.

Of the eight or nine instances of other linked aticles, two of them were memes or giffs, from Brigadier and Odds, of no particular value, IIRC.
One was the OP's. two were innocuous articles, from Securespark and Denso13, IIRC.
Two of them were articles about J K Rowling which is linked to the topic, but not really contributing anything to the discussion, posted by Dork Lard.
IIRC there were two posted links by motorbiking, one about Suella Braverman positioning herslef to the right of Genghis Khan, and the other an article from the Guardian. I specifically asked him for a case to support one of his claims, but there was nothing.

 

[nwgs]

As I thought, apart from the plethora of articles, studies, research papers, and real life data that I have presented in support of my arguments, there have been about eigth or nine other instances of links to other articles, posted by about six posters. Noe of which was JohnD. he presented nothing but slogans and disingenuous assumptions.

Of the eight or nine instances of other linked aticles, two of them were memes or giffs, from Brigadier and Odds, IIRC.
One was the OP. two were innocuous articles, from Securespark and Denso13, IIRC.
Two of them were articles about J K Rowling which is linked to the topic, but not really contributing anything to the discussion, posted by Dork Lard.
IIRC there were two posted links by motorbiking, one about Suella Braverman positioning herslef to the right of Genghis Khan, and the other an article from the Guardian. I specifically asked him for a case to support one of his claims, but there was nothing.

Quoting yourself! That’s so narcissistic it’s just unbelievable.

 

[nwgs]

0.044% of your posts are liked. That’s all you need to know.

 

[Roy Bloom]

No I’m just pointing out that you ramble on more than the rest of us combined. And not a single person has yet to agree.

7 Scientists whose ideas were rejected during their lifetimes

We've all had ideas - some good, some not so good. I can't begin to imagine how hair-pullingly frustrating it must be to hatch a brilliant new idea, believe passionately that it's right, then find everyone else ignoring you, or telling you that you're wrong, or even mocking you. Worse still...

www.famousscientists.org

Being a lone voice does not indicate that one is wrong.

I can understand how many on here are subject to group thought, especially when it's based on prejudice, lies and myths.

Groupthink is a phenomenon that occurs when a group of individuals reaches a consensus without critical reasoning or evaluation of the consequences or alternatives.

What Is Groupthink? Definition, Characteristics, and Causes

Groupthink is a phenomenon in which a group of individuals come to a consensus without critical reasoning or considering the consequences or alternatives.

www.investopedia.com

 

[Roy Bloom]

0.044% of your posts are liked. That’s all you need to know.

I'm not a populist. Are you?

 

[Roy Bloom]

And not made a single point.

0.044% of your posts are liked.

At least I put my points in the right place.
I hope you don't need maths in your profession!

 

[JohnD]

Are you psychic?
You have no idea what I believe, nor what I know.
Please do not misrepresent me, and absolutely do not pretend to know what I believe or know.
It's arrogant and disingenuous.

Oh Roy, you are silly.

You've made a habit of falsely claiming what you think I believe

And what you think Mrs Rowling believes.


Have you no shame?

 

[JohnD]

Would you not also agree then that; if a woman feels more comfortable using a women's only space, in preference to being forced to share a toilet with other men, then they should have that right.

Did he answer that?

 

[JohnD]

Why not?

Because they aren't the same thing.

So why do you keep pretending to think they are?

 

[Roy Bloom]

Oh Roy, you are silly.

You've made a habit of falsely claiming what you think I believe

And what you think Mrs Rowling believes.


Have you no shame?

It's clear from your persistent use of slogans, lack of supporting evidence and ad hominem and strawman arguments that you believe in gender essentialism: "the doctrine that there are two distinct sexes, male and female, created by God, and that individuals are immutably one or the other."
You wish to deny the existence of trans gender people. You at least want to deny them their rights enshrined in law.

The slight difference between JK Rowling and you is that she is outspoken about her beliefs, whereas you only skirt around the issue without coming out and stating what it is that you believe.

 

[JohnD]

It's clear from your persistent use of slogans, lack of supporting evidence and ad hominem and strawman arguments that you believe in gender existentialism: "the doctrine that there are two distinct sexes, male and female, created by God, and that individuals are immutably one or the other."
You wish to deny the existence of trans gender people. You at least want to deny them their rights enshrined in law.

The slight difference between JK Rowling and you is that she is outspoken about her beliefs, whereas you only skirt around the issue without coming out and stating what it is that you believe.

It's clear from your persistent posting of lies and misrepresentations that you are hoping to make a case you know to be wrong.

 

[Roy Bloom]

Did he answer that?

You want me to help ypu with your revision?

A woman is not forced to share a toilet with anyone, not even in uni-gender toilets.
There are cubicles in women's toilets and in uni-gender toilets.