National Grooming Gangs Inquiry Announced

He's totally useless
But he got voted in in London because he got majority votes in nine boroughs where we have 50% or less of the people are white British
 
yorksbuilder said:
He's totally useless
But he got voted in in London because he got majority votes in nine boroughs where we have 50% or less of the people are white British
Click to expand...
Highway Man said:
How is he the mayor of London? Pathetic
Click to expand...
Rigged votes.
Postal vote is his favourite tool, with studio flats holding 60/70 voters, apparently all living there.
Get rid of postal vote and would've been out his second time around.
 
yorksbuilder said:
He's totally useless
But he got voted in in London because he got majority votes in nine boroughs where we have 50% or less of the people are white British
Click to expand...

Isn't it a straightforward count of all ballots. How do we know which boroughs he "won". I have no idea because I don't live anywhere near London.
 
Last edited:
yorksbuilder said:
I think they can tell out of the 14 constituencies, which voted most strongly for him
Click to expand...

Yes, it looks like they do break it down by constituency. Here is an example I have found:

1759525731527.png
 
Two abuse survivors resign from the panel. They both smell a cover up in the making. One of them didn’t want it chaired by a police officer or a social worker because of a conflict of interest and on the news this morning, the other one said they were trying to steer it away from cultural and religious reasons. Not unlike certain people on this forum.

www.bbc.co.uk

Two grooming gang survivors quit national inquiry panel

Fiona Goddard and Ellie-Ann Reynolds quit their roles in protest at how the government had handled the process.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
 
Mottie said:
Two abuse survivors resign from the panel. They both smell a cover up in the making. One of them didn’t want it chaired by a police officer or a social worker because of a conflict of interest and on the news this morning, the other one said they were trying to steer it away from cultural and religious reasons. Not unlike certain people on this forum.

www.bbc.co.uk

Two grooming gang survivors quit national inquiry panel

Fiona Goddard and Ellie-Ann Reynolds quit their roles in protest at how the government had handled the process.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...
It's very obvious to most normal, non-bigoted posters on here, that the real interest in bringing the attention of the forum to the grooming gangs of Rochdale, etc, for some, is their islamophobia, xenophobia and overt racism.
They'll eagerly grasp any opportunity to point the finger at "them".
The frequency of the threads and posts about such crimes committed by a small section of the UK community, and the scarcity of attention drawn to the crimes committed by indigenous people is evidence of that.
No-one has any hard evidence that grooming occurring more in one culture than in any other because ethnicity data is not collected.
Pointing the finger at sections of the community does not help the victims and does not reduce sexual abuse, it merely diverts the attention to other issues, such as fomenting hatred.
It's all supposition based on bigotry, and an opportunity to blame "them".
Grooming and sexual abuse occurs in all cultures and has done so for millenia. It even occurs within the Royal family.
But frequently their involvement, and with the rich and famous is hidden, or when discovered, it is hushed up and covered up.
Sometimes sexual abuse of minors occurs in the very structures designed to protect minors, e.g. children's homes, schools, etc, even in the medical profession grooming and sexual abuse occurs.

Abuse of young females is part of the misogynistic base of a patriarchal culture.
Teaching, education and examples by adult males is the way to prevent such abuse.
Persistent pointing the finger at "them" presents the worst of examples. It just teaches hatred and division.
 
The government is currently considering recommendations from a working group on the definition [of Islamophobia].
It is aimed at defining Islamophobia or anti-Muslim hatred in a way “which is reflective of a wide range of perspectives and priorities for British Muslims”.

The Gumby's better be ware.
 
When the government is wrong it is dangerous to be right.
 
Nonsense.

No government yet, regardless of party, has ever been right.

Obviously some parties suit some, and others for others

But your comment is just ridiculous
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

fillyboy
The Great British National Strike
2 3 4
Replies
55
Views
3K
JohnD
JohnD
Back
Top