National Grooming Gangs Inquiry Announced

[Leftum]

Tom being a former member was never in question, as I recall. The fact is that Tom is a virtual username, and that username does not exist anymore.
But thanks to you, i've found some posts that Pete intentionally conflates me with Tom and some imagined debt owed to Pete, by Tom/me.
He repeated that scam just a few posts away.
So thanks for you assistance.
As to searching, any attempted searches for posts by Tom draws a blank. As I was not aware of the interchange between Tom and any others, it's not possible to guess any other names to search on.

I can find any old post—it’s a shame it’s beyond your grasp—

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Where did 'tomww' come from?

Searching for 'tom' gets this drop-down list:

View attachment 396761

which taps out at 'tomm..'

to find others you have to start adding letters, e.g.

View attachment 396762

There's only 1 'tomw...'

View attachment 396763

Precisely. i can only assume that leftum had previous knowledge of these posts, and used that previous knowledge to find those posts.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Precisely. i can only assume that leftum had previous knowledge of these posts, and used that previous knowledge to find those posts.

Oh he's been here before. And quite recently too.

Maybe he could find some of his own posts too

 

[Knave of Hearts]

I can find any old post—it’s a shame it’s beyond your grasp—

Then find a post of Tomww, not a post of someone who may or may not have altered that quote, which some are infamous for doing so. especially the posters who are naturally deceitful scamming posters.

 

[Brigadier]

CSE survivor was on R5L earlier.

Original enquiry was framed on Jay report, which was about CSE.

She said narrowing it to grooming gangs would mean her voice wouldn't be heard as she was originally said it would be.

Not all of the abused were so at the hands of grooming gangs, was her point.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Himmy/Tom/Knave has reached the point I call 'the Quickening', frequency of posting increases rapidly and he starts to lash out at everyone around him, based on previous experience that usually means he'll be gone within 24-28 hours.

It's a natural reaction to facing loads of false allegations.
It may not be your natural reaction if you knowingly post disinformation, and are caught out.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Now that several posters known for their dishonesty have diverted the thread, it's good to get back on it.

 

[Leftum]

Then find a post of Tomww, not a post of someone who may or may not have altered that quote, which some are infamous for doing so. especially the posters who are naturally deceitful scamming posters.

I’ve already done that- Tomww has been deleted so will show only if someone quoted his post—

 

[Knave of Hearts]

CSE survivor was on R5L earlier.

Original enquiry was framed on Jay report, which was about CSE.

She said narrowing it to grooming gangs would mean her voice wouldn't be heard as she was originally said it would be.

Not all of the abused were so at the hands of grooming gangs, was her point.

I was under the impression that it was a wider ranging enquiry, but the accurate details get jumbled, by politicians as well as enquiry participants.

On another note five of the survivors panel have said they will only continue if Jess Philips retains her role.

Since then, another five abuse survivors have written to the prime minister to say they will only continue to work with the inquiry if Jess Phillips keeps her job.

Search for new grooming inquiry head will 'take months'

The process to chose a chair for the inquiry was thrown into chaos when two leading the leading recused themselves from the job, the BBC understands.

www.bbc.co.uk

Also i thought there were 20 on the survivors panel, but it was originally 30, so 26 remain.

i also was under the impression that the four resignations wanted the enquiry to be focussed entirely on grooming gangs.

 

[morqthana]

CSE survivor was on R5L earlier.

Original enquiry was framed on Jay report, which was about CSE.

She said narrowing it to grooming gangs would mean her voice wouldn't be heard as she was originally said it would be.

Not all of the abused were so at the hands of grooming gangs, was her point.

So is johnny2007 now going to pop up and claim that she is trying to support rape gangs by saying that?

 

[Knave of Hearts]

I’ve already done that- Tomww has been deleted so will show only if someone quoted his post—

So you formed an opinion of Tom based on what was quoted by others?

 

[fillyboy]

CSE survivor was on R5L earlier.

Original enquiry was framed on Jay report, which was about CSE.

She said narrowing it to grooming gangs would mean her voice wouldn't be heard as she was originally said it would be.

Not all of the abused were so at the hands of grooming gangs, was her point.

How was it 'narrowed to grooming gangs', it was called the 'National grooming gangs inquiry.

 

[fillyboy]

It's a natural reaction to facing loads of false allegations.
It may not be your natural reaction if you knowingly post disinformation, and are caught out.

where did you 'catch me out?'

 

[Leftum]

So you formed an opinion of Tom based on what was quoted by others?

I formed my opinion based on his posts— the ones I’ve read lately—he seemed unhinged and maybe the sort to use weird websites —

 

[Knave of Hearts]

where did you 'catch me out?'

In the claim that Hamas were preventing foreign journalists entering Gaza, very recently is one time that comes easily to mind.

The idea that Egypt can unilaterally use the Rafah crossing, without Israel's agreement is another instance.