Trumps attack on Iran - 2026 edition

How will the upcoming attack on Iran go.

  • Total voters
    18
ellal said:
I thanked you because it shows your hypocrisy...

The pro israel mob claimed the gaza deaths figures (70,000+) as 'fake news'...

But then the IDF terrorists admitted that it was true...

No further comments about the figures from the supporters of genocide and ethnic cleansing thereafter ;)
Click to expand...

The claim that 70,000 civilians is the part I dispute.
 
SPLINE said:
I'm sure Starmer is a hero to communist idiots in America and elsewhere!!! Starmer, the man whose position depends on the vote of violent muslims; violent muslims who will attack any country in the world whose leaders go against islam; Starmer who legally protects violent muslims that gang-rape British children; Starmer who allows muslims to displace British residents from their home towns.
Click to expand...
You're just spouting garbage Tubbs.
 
aveatry said:
Do you ever post anything that is NOT fake, lies , and disinformation. You seem to fill your head with weird random Instagram and Facebook disinformation pages. You are becoming self radicalised
Click to expand...
That was a good representation of something Trump would say. Have you never heard him speak?
 
Philip Gordon, who was a national security adviser to the former US vice-president Kamala Harris, argued in 2015 that there was something fundamentally wrong about the US concept of regime change.

He wrote: “When implying the US can fix Middle Eastern problems if only it ‘gets it right’, it is worth considering that in Iraq the US intervened and occupied and the result was a costly disaster. In Libya the US intervened and did not occupy and the result was a costly disaster. In Syria the US neither intervened nor occupied and the result was a costly disaster”. Indeed, he wrote a whole book citing examples of how the US fails to anticipate the chaos that inevitably ensues after regime collapse. War can end a regime, but not install a cohesive society.

A Long Read in the Guardian this morning goes into the many reasons why the attack on Iran is a terrible plan.
 
fillyboy said:
The claim that 70,000 civilians is the part I dispute.
Click to expand...
Actually the Hamas figures don't discriminate between civilians and fighters..

And the IDF terrorists don't dispute the deaths figures...

You disputed the numbers, but now change your tune...

As all good genocide/ethnic cleansing supporters tend to do :rolleyes:
 
"Nobody likes war - it’s terrifying," one woman in Tehran tells BBC Persian.

"But those two months were so horrible that people just couldn’t take it anymore," she says, referring to the government's violent shutdown of protests earlier this year.

People would "rather die in bombing than in the Islamic Republic’s prisons, where there’s torture and sexual violence," she says.

"Maybe it’s hard to understand for people who aren’t here," she adds.

Source
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top