Polanski’s popularity plummets

Apparently we're being told by the usual suspects that deform haven't lost support despite their 'gas 'em all, hitler was right' fuhrer and a myriad of racist comments from their candidates...

What does that tell us about the usual suspects, and the disciples of a fascist/racist party in general ;)
Usual suspects? As in the polling companies?

They seem to show Reform are maintaining their lead and their margin.
 
Must be his threat to deport all migrants.
They do know of his long-term anti Semitism, I assume?
It shows that the anti semitic libel is manufactured for political purposes.
The fact that Nigel was anti semitic at school and indulged in anti semitic conspiracy theories when older, had no effect whatsoever on his support amongst Reform and other right wing parties, this alone proves that the right wing don't care about anti semitism , it is just a useful weapon to destroy their opponents.
In fact you can be as anti semitic as you like but as long you declare your support for Israel you be welcomed among the Pro Israel brigade.
 
seems the chap is a bit of a fraud.
Several posts claim that Reform are leading the polls, yet those same posters desperately dig around for a bit of mud to sling at the Green party.
If reform were so comfortably in the lead, why do their supporters need to search for a bit of gossip to try to muddy the other parties.


Often I see something that someone has written and I think I want to "like" that. But later in the same post, there's other stuff with which I'm ambivalent.
Do I "like" the post, if I only like a part of it? Will it be assumed that I "like" all parts of the post?
The "like" function doesn't allow us to "like" parts of a post. But what to do if I really "like" one part, but not particularly "like" all of it?
Will others misunderstand which parts of the post I like, and criticise me for liking all of it, when I only like a part of it?
Taking that post about Zionists controlling the Israeli government, it's factual, and it's not anti-Semitic to discuss it.
So to criticise someone for "liking" a comment, that explains how Zionist control the Israeli government is not anti-Semitic.
The Telegraph is making false allegations.

The anti-Semitic accusations have lost their meaning since anything anti-Israeli has been bracketed as anti-Semitic.
The incorrect use of the anti-Semitic card has had the effect of demonstrating how the allegation of anti-Semitism has become a weapon to resort to when legitimate arguments are exhausted.
 
"Polanski" (not even his real name) studied drama and was briefly an actor.

It all makes sense, everything since then has been an in-character act based on fiction.

I know and have known very similar people. Just spews lies, everything he says is some kind of weird fantasy. And gets very angry with anyone who sees through it and challenges him about it. Habitual lying is a mental disorder.
 
Even the greens think the greens have a problem with antisemitism

While Reform deny they have a problem. :rolleyes:


What is the best approach:
a) you are accused of being anti-Semitic, so you have an internal investigation to test the veracity of the allegations?
b) you are accused of being anti-Semitic, so you accuse the accusers of lying, and deny outright that you are anti-Semitic?
 
Back
Top