Trumpf didn’t have the common sense or courtesy give us notice of the attack but announced he’s using raf akatari before we’ve got a chance to put sir defences in.
Is it possible to criticise Trumpf’s failure to put to Congress the decision to attack Irann without it immediately being assumed that in doing so you are a supporter of Teyran?
I’ve been meemed. I was pointing out that if you are going to be picky and pedantic, there is a much bigger task on your hands. Discussion threads are not linear.
One of the experts was under investigation for fitness to practice but was allowed to give evidence as the hearing hadn't reached a conclusion at the time of the trial. The tribunal considered the allegations about Hindmarsh “may have the potential to impact on his ability to act as an expert...
It’s legal if Irann was an imminent threat, which works if imminent has a 47 year life span. There are parallels with WW1 which was sparked, if not caused, by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. I predict something more than a riot.
The war will last for some time but will not be an endless war. It’s becoming clearer that the regime is not one (dead) man but a well entrenched ideological system.
An up to date board with rcd/rcbo’s provides an additional measure of safety for faulty earth wiring but does not address the problem as there are likely to be metal switches and back boxes in the circuit. Testing earth continuity would identify if the problem is limited to that jb.