Trumps attack on Iran - 2026 edition

How will the upcoming attack on Iran go.

  • Total voters
    20
aveatry said:
There we have it everyone, proof that billy is indeed a foreign agent most likely paid to disrupt the UK
Click to expand...

So you make an utterly deranged accusation, and an utterly deranged assertion that he has to acquiesce to your utterly deranged requests to prove he is not what you say, and you claim that the fact that he pushes back against all that is proof that it's all true.

You know what that makes you, don't you.
 
MNW67 said:
It's getting a bit abstract. Let's apply the UN Charter 2.4 to the Iran war. It states:



So, the starting point is that the USA is acting illegally under international law. There is no doubt that international law exists and that the USA is breaking it.

The issue you are querying is whether anything can be done about it by the United Nations. That is where the veto becomes a problem. The UN could, in theory, pass various measures against the USA for its illegal war. Anything from sanctions through to authorising an international military force to defend Iran against the USA. But none of that is going to happen in practice, because the USA has a veto.

However, the USA is still breaking international law and carrying out an illegal war.
Click to expand...

I did hear that Russia has accused the US of violating 'internal law'.
 
algas said:
Let's hpoe Big don and the ***'s have the balls to finnish it and wipe the tea towel heads of the face of the earth
Click to expand...

Imagine how that would go down here if you were calling for the table cloth wearers to be wiped from the face of the earth

1772843363370.jpeg
 
transam said:
Afaik ??

The Ukraine have sent some personnel to the gulf as they have expertise in drone war fare in particular defending against drone attacks with electronics etc
Click to expand...

God knows why - Trump will just denigrate them for not sending anybody.
 
aveatry said:
The one handed house bound technophobe foreign agitator yet again swerves a simple way to prove me wrong and reverts to abuse instead.
At least whilst willy is spending time making up excuses and swerving me that it is not stirring up trouble on this site.
Click to expand...
I have no need to prove you wrong, you are wrong until you can prove your hypothesis is right.
As for reverting to abuse, you've accused me of being a foreign agitator, how is that not lying accusatory abuse?
In any legal sense or scenario it would be serious libel.
How is lying, potentially libelous abuse not "making trouble on this site"?
What fantasy world do you inhabit?

You've been proven to be a deceitful abusive liar, who thinks he can demand that other members prove their locality.

Jogon on, eejit.
 
Last edited:
transam said:
The school that was hit was due to ***s poor intel

It was a former rev guard military building

Similar thing happened in Iraq when a bomb shelter full of civilians was hit
Click to expand...
Four year old intel is not good enough to be used for targeting. Using it is a failure of due diligence. Especially when they know there are medical and educational facilities in US and Iranian military compounds.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top