OMG

and he would be right, I think this too.
Any idea what he meant?
No, I watched the clip im not even sure it was real he was just rambling on.Any idea what he meant?
Why not? The US won't just give it back without a cost and if you've got sitting ducks and your goal is to make the war as expensive for the US as possible you go for it.The issue is would the Iranians risk destroying there own oil export facility ???

Exactly this ^^^^^^Trumpf's putting off the difficult decision he's got to make. It's not Garza, you cant blow a country that size to smithereens without using nuclear.
Why not? The US won't just give it back without a cost and if you've got sitting ducks and your goal is to make the war as expensive for the US as possible you go for it.
In all likelihood if the US occupies the island the cheapest way to get it back would be to level it first then rebuild.
It's all just one big swamp right enough.Makes you wonder how much the arms manufacturers contribute to the GOP
The right wing press that condemned Bliars invasion are criticising Starmy for not act. Not because he is wrong but because weakening him politically is more important than avoiding ww3Let's hope Starmer holds out against this utter madness!
It's always the same way with the right wing nutjobs and fascists!The right wing press that condemned Bliars invasion are criticising Starmy for not act. Not because he is wrong but because weakening him politically is more important than avoiding ww3