Search results

He's not full of it. He has space for other types of prejudice. ;)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c7056exw78xo

Squirrels.

He was innocent, and remains so, until proven guilty. He's never been charged, never mind tried.

Who says that? Or have you adopted other's habit of using strawman arguments and dishonesty because intelligent reasoning has failed you?

So that's where you've been ....

truth in your case is what you believe, not reality

Like people trying to discredit your argument based on where you live?

That's a corruption of his vision. His vision was more like Blue Mink's Melting Pot natural phenomenon, rather than a forced migration of people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi Coudenhove-Kalergi, R. N. (1925). Practical Idealism, English ver. 1.2 (PDF). Trans...

I'm still waiting for this supposed evidence you said you would present to prove my assertion false. All I've had so far is snippets of various posts of mine cobbled together by you in an effort to discredit me, and an immense amount of waffle.

An analogy of the real reason behind most people's refusal to accept that sex is not binary: The 1837 Act to create the requirement of sex being registered, as only either male or female, for all newborn babies was created by the C of E clergy representatives in the House of Lords, which was...

He sounds like a well-educated, well-travelled visionary with a wide and open view of the world.

Only if it's in your settings.

It's superfluous waffle. It doesn't even approach what a sensible intelligent debate is about.

Then you need to take care with your quotes. Although you have been extremely careful with your snippets of my comments from multiple posts, which you've cobbelled together to make it into something i didn't say.

He's welcome to it. I know what he'll resort to saying, something along the lines of man is a man and a woman is woman.

I'm done with your trolling now. You've resorted to being silly. I don't wrestle with pigs, and I don't play chess with pigeons

You've lost the plot. No-one suggested a tansman would be wearing a dress. So i think we can describe this one as yet another strawman argument. They're coming thick and fast now. :rolleyes:

Another question based on a Strawman argument again.

You mean that complaints may have been made, but no record was produced? That's highly unlikely. You claimed you'd witnessed many occurrences of such events. Did you report such events?