Search results

They're called transvestites. :rolleyes: He doesn't think he's a woman, he is very aware that he's a man. Now that the discussion is turning into farce, there's no more need of my arguments.

A cleaner alleged to have committed sexual abuse over 20 years ago, and no charges brought, is hardly likely to bring the corporaton into disrepute.

I'm not wagging a finger. I'm arguing my position. I'm talking about intolerance of transpeople, not criminals who dress up as females to go into female spaces. It seems some people either can't differentiate or intentionally decide to conflate the two.

Yeah, I thought it was very topical after Spline's claim of importing millions of people from foreign lands.

He has no control so he doesn't illumminate anything.

After 20 years or more, he's probably come to terms with it, the allegation that is, not the dismissal.

He claims to be a live wire. Maybe he doesn't have the capacitance to know what we're talking about. Too much ballast clouds his judgement. ;)

Slavery was made illegal nearly 100 years ago. The UN recently described it as the greatest crime against humanity.

Yeah, he's not switched on.

Not necessarily. He might have lied on his application. He might be guilty of bringing the BBC into disrepute. They might have gone through the proper processes. There's loads of reasons for his dismissal, if that's what it was.

He is known for his incandescent rage.

Glad to see you're in agreement.

He's not that bright. ;) I hear he's on a diet to get lighter. ;)

And maybe it hasn't. :rolleyes:

Don't drag koolpoc into this. :rolleyes: He's happy enough in his kennel, enjoying his carnivore diet and burying the surplus that he can't eat at the moment.

No-one is expecting you nor anyone else to tolerate such behaviour. It's probably been illegal for many decades. But the law now requires transmen to use the female spaces. So which is preferred: transwomen, looking for all intents and purposes like women, or transmen, looking to all intent and...

Several allegations between 1997 and 2000 But wasn't charged through insufficient evidence.

It's not a monopoly by homosexuals. :rolleyes: It's practised in many religions. A few of them work hard to hide it. Am I going back on your ignore list now? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Chuck a stone in DIYnot GD and there's a good chance you'll hit a homophobic poster. Personally I'd much prefer to be homosexual than homophobic. I don't have an irrational fear of anything.

You care so much that you've looked up their preferred sexuality? :rolleyes: