Search results

How do you know? Do you understand the difference between flamboyance and homosexuality? Anyway, have you forgotten something:

Then it's become intolerance. :rolleyes:

If it grows, then it is because it's fomented by the intolerant people in society, the people who want to maintain their ownership of privilege. From her book, "We Need New Stories" Paraphrased from memory. I'm not as eloquent as she is with her explanation.

It's OK to be intolerant. It's also OK to illustrate your intolerance with examples of your intolerant behaviour. It's even OK to preach intolerance, within the limits of the law. But then live with the intolerant society you're responsible for creating. We make society, and society makes us...

Mobile phone batteries also catch fire, but most of us take ours to bed every night.

Australians enjoy a far greater "foreign born " society than the UK, over twice the number. About 30% in Australia to about 13% in the UK. Maybe that reduces the amount and degree of racism experienced by the immigrants in Australia. Also Australia is a more "outdoorsy" livestyle. It's difficult...

Spline telling lies. Now that is unusual. :rolleyes:

With approximate 4% of UK population identifying as homosexual, it would be amazing if the BBC did not employ many homsexuals. It would also probably be illegal. :rolleyes: Have you ever had to disclose your sexual preference on an application for work? :rolleyes: With a workforce of about...

I'm paraphrasing the 1837 Act, and the recent Supreme Court judgement. Do you accept that people are born intersex, or do you deny that it happens? Do you refute the data, and pretend it doesn't exist, or it's been invented?

You're misquoting or intentionally misinterpreting what I said. I said many women are stronger, fatser, etc than many men. a) it's not so rare. It's several hundred thousand in UK. The number of intersex in UK outnumber the amount of people who identify as Cornish. And you're right, occasional...

That analogy relies on two funadamental concepts: 1. An assertion is an assertion. It does not become "false" until it's proven to be false. You described my assertion as "false" without disproving it. Therefore my assertion remains credible and true until you disprove it. 2. Russell's teapot...

I've presented the evidence, twice now: I'll explain it to you: Males, according to their birth certificate must use the male spaces, and females, according to their birth certificate must use the female spaces. Their gender is now irrelevant as far as which space they can use. It couldn't be...

Another constant whining winner. :rolleyes:

Hitler was democratically elected........at first. Mussolini was "democratically elected" after he took the role of PM. Pinochet was also 'elected' after he seized power. Putin has always won his 'election'. Erdogan always wins his 'election' Donald trump was democratically elected but promised...

Gam Gam is another Hebrew piece of Music.

I made an assertion. For you to claim it was false, you need to disprove it. It's good that you now admit you have not tried to disprove my assertion. Unlike before when you claimed you had disproved my assertion. Until you do prove my assertion is false, it stands as true Only when you have...

I don't need to, it's in the Supreme Court judgement, which I suspect you have scrutinised to be able to assert that you can disprove my assertion. But alas you can't, and you haven't tried because you know you can't.. Trans men should use the Female spaces, not the male spaces, as according to...

More vagueness. If you can't be specific about what you claim to have disproved, it illustrates that you haven't and are incapable of disproving it. And nice try with the abuse, you might get away with it, but I'm sure I couldn't, and it would be a perfect opportunity to exclude me from the thread.

Horses and lots of other animals see colours differently to humans.