Search results

You didn't ask me, but I agree with both questions. (I think I know the answer to no. 1!) What is happening right now is an ongoing invasion (supported by both our so-called government and the Frogs). I can't imagine any other country in the world encouraging such a thing by handing the...

In rejoining this debate, I want to say that if nothing else, opinions on here may reflect how the whole country feels: many different opinions of which way to go. I suspect, though, that the general agreement is that Labour is not the way to go! Having seen many news reports, I would have...

We've had the shed for 23 years, though apart from the roof the rest of it doesn't see much sun. No signs of any deterioration.

Perhaps you should have gone for a plastic one, like wot I have got! Well, it will never rot.

I'm afraid that I don't remember your help regarding equipment issues, though to be honest my memory is pretty bad these days and, sadly, getting worse. I would certainly thank you for such help anyway. I'd like to apologise for being insulting and rude to you. Perhaps I have over-reacted...

In other words, you are too pig-headed to admit that you were wrong, despite that being pointed out by other members as well. I shall have to remember to avoid Lucid in future. It would only result in cheap and unfounded arguments on his part.

As far as I am aware, there is no necessity to pay the TV licence in order to view internet programmes, though if they can be proved as being transmitted (over the internet) 'live', the naughty BBC might still object. I'm not sure how true this is, though. In addition, I should state that...

What you said was: "If you don't want to pay for a TV licence, then you must abandon any way of watching live TV. This means no TV aerial, no satellite dish+receiver, no cable TV box etc. "NO TV AERIAL". To me, that means that you suggest such people have NO TV AERIAL. To explain even more...

That is exactly what many people do. Before the oncoming BBC criticisms, Marge actually does pay the BBC licence.

Nonsense. You may not legally watch any live TV, but you are not obliged to remove your TV aerial or, for that matter, dishes, etc. You simply have to promise that you do not watch any live TV. Do try to get your fact right.

I think that perhaps, just to be on the safe side, I'd drive at a notch or two below the stated speed limit. I suppose that you might arrive a minute or less behind your expected time.

Buy a plastic bowl.

Perhaps Barki is barking mad?

Camoron and Treason May. Two of our worst PMs, although nowhere near as bad as the incredibly crap TwoTierKeir.

Because the BBC has now been shown to be definitely left-wing biased.

The 'fee' is optional. The only legal requirements in order to refuse to pay the BBC Tax, is not to watch any BBC programmes or any LIVE programmes. The easiest solution is simply to avoid the BBC and any live-broadcast programmes. Watch only non-live or 'catch-up' programmes and avoid the BBC...

Refugees? Claiming refuge from France? Or choosing the country with the weakest government and the most generous handouts?

We all know where the BBC's loyalties lie! Perhaps they are hoping that by stirring things up, they might attract more licence fee payers.

Thank you. Encouraging. Yes, as the old saying goes: 'the emptiest vessels shout the loudest'. Fortunately, I am adept at ignoring empty vessels!

Do I care?