Search results

Nah, she was after a meal ticket.

So why haven't "we"?

And the tech hasn't fundamentally changed since apollo (reuse ability excepted).

We haven't been keeping anyone alive on the moon for anything more than a few days. And the space stations are all protected by the earth's magnetosphere. I'll stick with my views on this, until there's a significant change in circumstances.

Like I already said : #36. Keeping someone alive on mars : not likely. Getting them back alive : forget it. Even if you overcame the money issue, of which you'd need mountains of the stuff.

We're still lighting candles, with a maximum velocity of a couple of tens of thousands of miles per hour. Until we can develop the tech to reach squillions of mph from earth's surface, it ain't happening. I make the point of "from earth's surface", as ion drives and the like might have high...

Getting a human onto the Martian surface is not beyond the realms of what's plausible within the next few years. Not killing them within the first few hours or days though, is another thing altogether. And getting them back - alive - no chance.

#firstworldproblemsinnit ;-)

Nor read it.

(Needy) Nige?

Picking similar party names isn't a great idea either, as their target demographic are not known for their attention to detail, or literacy talent..... :whistle:

While the bellends, the tinfoil hatters, and the selfish put their oar in, a smart bloke lays it out (y)

Like a hotel then, but with more zeroes.

He's not a politician, and he makes that very clear. ;-)

There's more chance of a brain surgeon in a dinghy, judging by the comments read out here (y)

:mrgreen:

Chin up