Search results

:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: The three amateur Inspector Clouseaus building on their conspiracy theories. :D

Have a soothing cup of tea, and take a nap. :rolleyes:

You're amusing me by you turning yourself this way and that exercising your vindictive hatred. :giggle:

I was describing your ludicrous conspiracy theories.

So if I didn't come back on here under an alias, I'm not sick in the head, and i don't need your pity. :giggle: You, on the other hand, are being consumed by your own vindictive hatred.

I couldn't put words in your mouth, it was too full of shoite. Who were elected by voters. Do you not understand the connection? :rolleyes: Pure conjecture on your part. You have no way of knowing who voted for whom. It could just as easily as previous Tory voters turning to Reform and...

I didn't, it was an intentional slur. You, on the other hand have been caught out by a slur that was too sophisticated for your understanding, much to your chagrin.

Only the county is run by Reform, in charge of potholes. :giggle: The Stafford borough is Labour controlled, as is their MP.

So you have no way of knowing who voted for whom, or who they voted for last time. :rolleyes: So you were talking shoite.

Is that in their manifesto, or in your head?

I'll take that as a miserable failure.

The point is you, nor transam nor anyone else has the slightest bit of evidence that Labour voters switched to Reform because it's a secret ballot. You implied that Reform success was based on Labour voters switching, which is pure conjecture, because you and no-one else has the evidence.

For someone who is just curious and means me no harm, and wants to be "my friend" you're very desperate to know where I'm from. It appears to me that your claim to mean me no harm was just a lie. Because I refused to tell you where I'm from, you make assumptions and broadcast that assumption...

If that's what you think you read in my post, I'm even more convinced you have the intelligence of a dog.

You're not obliged to read my comments. And you're certainly not obliged to respond to them. Judging by your recent level of response, perhaps it's better if you don't respond.

Absolutely stark raving bonkers. :rolleyes:

Internal competition for the leader do not demonise their own party. That would be an own goal to every other party. :rolleyes:

Give us an example, not expect me to find one for you. :rolleyes: BTW, the UTK march was a march by the right-wing, some of them violent criminals. So if that's your idea of "lefties" dividing social cohesion in UK, you're very badly mistaken. :rolleyes:

Not afraid to, I just have no intention to provide you with a stick to try and beat me with. It would waste my time disarming you of whatever weapon you think you've found. Although I know you'd enjoy the attention. :rolleyes: Not that you could pick one up with your paws. Needing attention...

You look upset. Has someone upset you?