Search results

I think your reply prove my suspicions: And elsa insists on dragging the discussion down to her level: coarse and poor English. :rolleyes:

Think: who are the ones fomenting hatred? Who are the ones responsible for social division? Who are the ones arguing for less social division and more responsible reporting?

Spineless' figures are his imagined fantasies. :rolleyes:

It's not only Indians who serve curry in UK's restaurants. Do catch up.

How long would an openly gay Jew last on here, I wonder. :rolleyes:

You can. I do enjoy your thoughtful opinions, supported by rational arguments and reliable data. The problem is they're so few and far between. :) I can't remember the last one. :giggle:

Everything is the fault of immigration, according to you. :rolleyes: Maybe your sad little existence and your inherent hatred for immigrants is also the fault of foreigners. :rolleyes:

That's OK, if you prefer to make comments without being willing to discuss them. :giggle:

On what do you base your accusation? Glad we agree. I don't think an intelligent discussion depends on what Notch might or might not agree on. :rolleyes: Because your bigotry refuses to allow you to see the truth. No surprises there. I am precisely right on this. I can believe that you...

Being an asylum seeker is not illegal.

You mean it's different to your toxic propaganda? :oops: So Starmer was proven right to ban far-right violent activists from entering UK. Job well done! Isn't that better than being a bottom feeder? :giggle:

And aveatry kindly provides the proof. :oops:

No. Surely you know by now that I never give out personal information because the likes of you, Mottie, aveatry, et all will weaponise it.

Did she say that? If not why do you think you are qualified to add to what she said? Do you always add your thoughts to other's comments, and claim it was they that said it? Are you suggesting we keep the status quo so that refugees must be prepared to risk their lives in order to seek asylum...

Mottie now in full troll mode. And trying to ridicule the definition of racism, and being cheered on by others of similar disposition. But he is known for inventing his own version of definitions for the meaning of words, so no doubt he'll be using his own definition for the future.

That's because there isn't any. But it's what motivated elsa to claim it was illegal.

It's still not a protected characteristic, so not a hate crime. :rolleyes:

I see Mottie is intent on proving his trolling predilection as well as his xenophobic anti-foreigner bigotry.

Do tell us, transam, how would you organise a re-think of the laws of the ECHR that have protected 745 million people (not including all migrants to all European countries) for the last 75 years?

No I don't that;'s why I asked? :oops: That's what your version of English looks like to an English speaker. :oops: