Search results

Repeating the lessons learned from their parents.

So supposedly 60,000 xenophobic foreigner-hating racists, and 9 of them so stupid they couldn't contain their hatred. :rolleyes:

Just like you can determine a person's ethnicity and religion on sight, from a distance, :rolleyes: most of us can determine a poster's political affiliation by their messages.

Don't forget to take a photo of a postbox before you leave. Otherwise avearty will accuse you of not being in UK, for what difference he thinks that makes. :rolleyes:

Another example of some right-wingers exploiting the opportunity to post pro-Reform comments, except they're based on a complete misunderstanding. It illustrates the inability of Right-wingers, reform supporters especially, to understand the real issues.

Over what time period is important. Is this yet another question you're going to segway around? :rolleyes:

What happened to them? Who was it?

You haven't named nor explained who was the one and only one that you've highlighted yet. Pointless looking for others until you tell us about the first one. Do you think there's any in the other parties? For example, who was a regular on RT?

What happened to him?

Of course they have personal opinions, but.... What is this supposed to mean? If you want to have a discussion, can you please write in English. :rolleyes: Essayez de rédiger votre commentaire de manière à ce qu'il soit compréhensible.

To protect the vulnerable or the criminals? That's the idea of assessing asylum seekers. :rolleyes: Ridiculous strawman argument. You can't sensibly discuss the real issues, so you invent one that you can address. :rolleyes: All religions comprise that form of demographic. :rolleyes: 100% is...

We're discussing criminal behaviour in political parties, one party in particular. Try to keep on topic. I know it's difficult for some. :rolleyes:

I don't. That's why I asked. Is it the ethnicity, the sexuality, the immigrant status, his politics, or the transgender that concerns diy_is_fun. Or is it some sort of combination of those factors? Unless diy_is_fun can bring himself to explain, we're left guessing. But he's unwilling to...

Of course it matters. And historic crimes are important, that is why the time periods are important. If something happens biennial, compared to something else which happens weekly, there is an obvious difference between the high probability of the one thing happening next week, but not the other.

Do you know what the truth is? If so, why can't you tell us? Is it some great secret? Because people say "Rothschilds" as though it's some magic explanation. Assume I've just arrived on earth, and explain to me how the Balfour declaration is connected to the Rothschilds, and what strings you...

Obviously, you have an opinion,but you are unwilling to share that opinion. :rolleyes:

Don't kid yourself. You're as bad as Koolpc inventing "facts" to suit your bigotry. Using false information passed as "fact" des several things: It shows you lack integrity. It show you invent information to suit your narrative, as and when it suits. It illustrates that you're talking shoite...

the problem with UK politics is the persistent and invariable pendulum effect, swing from right to left, back again, and occasionally swinging further to the left or right, every 5 years. In addition the adversarial setup often acts more like an antagonistic approach. What's shoite about it?

I thought I was supposed to be an AI BOT, or Himmie, or some other forum members double identity. I don't mind these multiple roles, in fact I quite enjoy them.

Over what time period? Cyril Smith's offences date back to the 1960s. John was listing the Reform members that have been exposed and binned over the last few weeks. The rate of expulsions of reform members over the time period used by John for a similar time period as that you've listed, isn't...