Search results

Bigotry driving your assumptions as usual. :rolleyes: The usual offender of any femicide is a close relative, everywhere.

That's a contradiction. Not so long ago we some claiming Sweden was the rape capital of the world, and that's definitely not a Muslim country. You racists make it up, to suit your bigotry, as you go. :rolleyes:

Do you have any evidence that the Imam's behaviour was covered up by the Mosque Committee? You're obviously using Mottie's tactic of using your own version of definition of words. "Grooming gang" does not only mean a group of mainly Muslim men targeting young white girls. It means any group...

Do you not think that such behaviour took place for decades in all sections of society, e.g. religion, childens' homes, young offenders homes, boarding schools, etc. The children were not believed over the "reputation" of the offender.

Criminals, of all sorts. commit crimes when the opportunity arises, irrespective of the ethnicity or religion of their victims.

They don't. They're shunted hither and thither to hide their crimes. They know the organisation will cover for them. So they cover up the crimes of their religious leaders.

Both Iran and IGRC have been accused of war crimes. As has Israel and IDF. Yet UK seeks to proscribe only Iran and/or IGRC, not Israel nor iDF. Weird that, don't you think? Do you think politics has anything to do with it?

There's no where to hide for such Muslim church leaders. Unlike the Christian and Catholic religious leaders that have enormous organisations to hide them and support them.

You just did.

You're stretching my comprehension ability in comprehending your comprehensive comments about comprehension.

That doesn't change the stupidity of describing a state-backed military organisation as terrorists. If the description of terrorism is extended to include state-backed military committing war crimes, then the IDF would also be described as terrorists. Not according to UK, nor the other 185...

I assume every one needs their medications, as prescribed. Otherwise they wouldn't be prescribed. :rolleyes: Next time I see the doctor, I'll ask him for some pills which I don't need. :D You really do have trouble comprehending the words that you use.

The IRGC is a branch of the Iranian military. To proscribe them as terrorists would be like calling the Argentinian Army, or the IDF, or the Royal Marines as terrorists. :rolleyes: The IRGC is a fully functioning state-backed military organisation.

Filly's overactive imagination.

Not read things literally? Do you mean, functional illiteracy? Where you read the words but lack the ability to comprehend the meaning. You have my sympathy. :rolleyes: What it would indicate is that you have an inability to express your emotions without resorting to offensive abuse. Those...

No I don't skip round the hospital. It's uncouth. I don't suppose that would bother you.

NO, UK has never had a referendum on PR. It was on AV. A different concept entirely.

Not necessarily. They have already applied for an extended visa. Those now complaining are the ones who voted for the rule change last year, which was passed unanimously. :rolleyes: It wasn't put to a referendum, It was only MSPs voting for it.

They were elected perfectly legally. Hard luck if you don't like the laws of the UK, Scotland especially.

And yet the UK government continues with its proscription of Palestine Action despite the overwhelming evidence of Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing and War Crimes committed by Israel against Palestinians, Lebanese and Iranians.