Search results

We're not doing links to original sources in this thread are we? You sure as hell aren't. Here's an example where five soldiers on sentry duty watched an alien craft for 12 minutes and didn't think to film it or report it. https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=197527 With evidence like that how can...

This entire thread is based on 50 year old footage. :rolleyes:

Have alien visitations dropped off since 2000 or stayed the same? Because the number of recordings isn't going up in line with the number of cameras. The immediate reaction of anyone under the age of 30 to see something more interesting than a plastic bag blowing in the wind is to film it, so...

Absolutely this, back when images had to be engraved in rock the lack of any pgotogrpic evidence was understandable. Now everyone is roughly 5cm from a 6mp camera 24/7 the lack of any footage of aliens is pretty substantial. Now there is footage of odd things but they get debunked quite quickly.

So why did you link to the FBI? I'll bet you've no idea what documents you're even talking about, haven't seen the originals and can't find them now. You just watched some clickbait on YouTube and regurgitated it straight back up again because you're overly credulous.

And which one of those files contains these shocking revelations? Which of the FBI files support your original post?

Link to the actual material rather than the ranting of a madman?

No ****, you have to be over 30,000 feet or so to get below -34 degrees to form exhaust contrails. Its like saying that all wakes from boats are in the water.

Liar liar pants on fire

To show how Aveatry is talking nonsense here is a serious incident report where two jet planes were on a converging course at similar altitudes (500 feet separation ) and approached to as close as 5 nautical miles before they took emergency action. https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/553751...

I don't believe that's what you've seen because ATC won't allow that. Civilian Jets aren't allowed to get that close to each other. No, because I can't work out what you would class as a 'Chemtrail' exactly. Plus I have every confidence that even if I did find one you'd claim it was a leftover...

No copy of the photos of course, just ranting from the village nutter.

And yet you haven't done that. Grab a photo next time and a screen grab. If it happens so often it should be easy.

This is not the logical smack down you seem to think it is. 1) prove there are no contrails today. 2) prove there are no contrails that meet your definition of 'chemtrail' Why not today? You still haven't got any idea why this is happening or why Sunday is special.

There's no so such thing as a Chemtrail. https://www.skyspyphotos.com/pictures/contrails-in-the-night-sky

The spelling mistakes are a bit too much. Tone it down a bit and your troll account will last longer.

https://www.pexels.com/photo/contrail-over-cloud-on-night-sky-17103645/

Actually you can, although it's not common. Different models and eras of Jet engines are more or less prone to create contrails because of the temperature of their exhaust. For example all engines are more likely to produce contrails when they are working harder so planes gaining altitude might...

They aren't.

Its amazing, the same people who deny climate change because the weather is always changing insist the atmosphere is so static that the temperature at 33,000 feet can't vary at all day to day or a kilometre higher.