Search results

Yep, just like the himmy 'label'. But he's not alone in that.

About 10 years after the height restriction removed, the DEI policy was implemented. :rolleyes: So the Met drop the height restriction, and ten years later someone thinks, 'Oh, we should give that policy a name.' :D What did they call in other forces, and in other countries that also dropped...

And how many times has your vindictive attitude felt the need to weaponise it? :rolleyes:

The search function doesn't provide that kind of functionality. But rest assured I'll keep it in mind if I do find one. :rolleyes:

Dummy. The height restriction was dropped before the introduction of DEI as a policy. But that's is irrelevant. You don't send two slightly built policewoman and one male officer to arrest two burly known violent offenders. :rolleyes:

DEI is a strategic policy, not a day-to-day tactical command unit. :rolleyes: You're not very good at discerning strategic policy from day-to-day tactics, are you? :rolleyes:

You wanted me to post an image of my nearest post box, which will have a unique identity number on it. And because I refused, you imagined that I must live in Pakistan. So you built a conspiracy theory around your imagined scenario. Sound familiar? :rolleyes:

Think what?

And of course, you've never resurrected an old post. :rolleyes:

The policeman who kicked him in the head while he was lying pone and incapacitated on the floor is still under investigation. I suspect that more potentially arrested people will now resist arrested if that's what is likely to happen while they're being arrested. But my biggest criticim is for...

I've stated for as long as I've been here, i do not reveal any personal information because people like you will weaponise. And you've proven me to be sensible in my decision because in absence of any personal information, you imagine something, which you then weaponise. :rolleyes: If you...

I trust you were reporting all those abusive posts of yours that were trying to get me to reveal my location. :rolleyes:

You admitted to be a member of the 'Blade Runners' group who were responsible for disabling the ULEZ cameras. You've admitted to be active in that group. You've admitted to supporting the criminal damage committed by the group, describing them as Robin Hoods. You've admitted to avoiding paying...

What? I'm wrong that your imagined circumstances of my religion, abode, etc is not congruent with my circumstances in reality? So you think your imagination is more accurate than my reality? You regularly prove just how deluded you are because you think you're a dog. But to think your...

I didn't forget. You didn't really want my opinion. It was simply an introduction to your hypocritical highlighting of my behaviour, when yours is it equally as bad, or worse. :rolleyes:

Seven years ago? :oops: No wonder you were too embarrassed to show it before. And you continually refer to it as a weapon of choice, to be abusive. How vindictive is that, you can't let go of a seven year old post. :oops:

You'd better report me then. What's that? You already have? Why am I not surprised? :rolleyes: Off you trot to the mods again. You must be on first name terms by now. :rolleyes: Pssst, don't forget to tell them about your abusive comments. :rolleyes:

So long ago you can't remember? Or is it your age, you can't remember? But you hang on to that opportunity to show where someone's dream didn't come true. :rolleyes:

You've asked a searching question, and this is the result, which illustrates the intelligence of the typical RW nutters: In their opinion, violence is the only possible result. I'm amazed that they manage to tie their shoelaces each morning.

Well you've found a way round it. :rolleyes: