Search results

merely says: Much like Part P, that's it; there is no more.

But will they be justified in doing so?

Where did you see that?

You said in your other thread that you wanted the new lights on the same switch as the existing ones.

How would you use it to check if a conductor is continuous or not?

You have four rectangles: the same as your old switches; just copy the wiring. Don't mix them up.

Just copy the wiring positions as in your old switches.

Well done - yes, you can use that. I don't know the make - but how bad can it be? It's just a switch.

It's a type of switch necessary when a light is operated by more than two switches. It switches from parallel connections to across connections as in the different diagrams on the switches.

This one: You might be able to replace it with an intermediate switch.

Ok, yes.

As it is drawn, presumably the unknown destination is the switch and it is a switch cable. I don't think you are using the word terminal correctly but - yes. Run a cable from the switch to a new switch and then the lights. So what? Ok. You will have to use the switch with the electric supply.

What you proposed to do is a switched live. To make it work independently of the room lights you would need a permanent live (and the neutral that goes with it, of course). Yes - if you are able to do it properly. Not sure what you mean. 240V switches are not allowed in Zone 1 or 2. If within...

Nothing at all to worry about.

You can - but do you not think tenants capable of removing the fuse? The cable is the spur - fused or otherwise.

That's why RCDs are - should be - tested with the circuit disconnected.

Connect the switches properly?

You are more or less correct. An accessory only creates a 'safe zone' for cables connected to it.

If the cable can withstand any short-circuit or fault current, then yes. Why not just use the appropriately rated fuse (wire) or cable?

Yes.