Search results

Not on my own, so no ;-)

Iirc, you wouldn't eat the fish out of the Douro, as it is not far off an open sewer :sick:

Eleven months of giddy posting on here then not going anyway, you mean (y) True dat ;-)

You'll be on your own then, coz world cups are every four years (y)

Behold! Nigel Fromage is approached by a man with a bin on his head. Or something like that :ROFLMAO:

Yes, the actions of the few are not indicative of the majority.

Explain this then.

Dont tell me your concerned for the safety of MPs?

Pah! You can prove anything with....... facts. ;-)

I just hope the finalists shake Orangina's fragile little donnies really, really hard :mrgreen: Sh!thousery (y)

At least we're in the age of Photoshop though (y)

It doesn't matter whether Fromage wins or loses. What shred of legitimacy was left is gone. If he hangs on, the questions won't stop, any more than they do for any other politician who has given cause. And what's more, not only will it be about "skeletons in the cupboard", there will be fresh...

Not at all. It is the other candidates refusing to give legitimacy to him.

He's doing it because he wants to be able to say that "the people have spoken". It's another "man of the people" play. "The people" who either do not know the details, or do not care about them. Neither of which absolves him of any culpability, should the Standards Committee find him in breach.

When you were bigging up installing that "media centre", they actually sold you a mediocre centre :mrgreen:

That's would be nowhere as bad. Apart from "the roolz", the issue is that if Fromage ever got to be in power, he could divert our money to his benefactors. Remember when Bliar was accused of getting through human rights legislation that directly favoured his wife's law practice? Same principle.

"Admissions" (plural, as he can't decide just which one to commit to) is the word you're after (y)

The money will still be investigated, win or lose. Rightly so.