Search results

Is there a difference? And in 1609 it would have been an Englishman and presumably a few colleagues. Not "England", which stayed where it was. Much less Britain.

How do you know how they feel? Have any of your children been murdered?

Serious questions - are immigrants housed near where you live, and do you have any daughters?

As well as the boiler, pump and any motorised valves. We don't have enough info to comment IMO.

Where did I say the RNLI shouldn't rescue migrants in danger? I just said the migrants shouldn't put themselves at risk, and neither should irresponsible hill walkers. They should claim asylum in the first safe country

Your stupidity knows no bounds. Nobody's defending R Lowe. Haven't you anything better to do than write these idiotic posts?

So you agree with me then?

I've a suggestion for anybody not wanting to risk drowning in the Channel - don't get in a boat and try to illegally migrate to the UK. They could try claiming asylum in one of the several safe countries they've passed through. And that's the minority who are fleeing a genuinely unsafe country...

Do you really think Rupert Lowe's crass remark will cause them distress compared with that of the murders?

It's still confected outrage

It was silly of R Lowe to say one murder instead of one murder incident, but it sounds like confected outrage to me. Like when Ken Clarke mentioned "less serious" cases of rape and caused a furore. Miliband among others were happy to say rape A was more serious than rape B, but wouldn't accept...

You could just as easily say any driver in an accident caused by his lack of due care should have his insurance declared void. The point of insurance is to cover the driver when he's in the the wrong. The insurance company would have a better chance of getting out of paying if nobody is at fault...

Bedfordshire family murdered. Likely culprit fled to Zimbabwe

There was a thread on here a few weeks ago about merge-in-turn. Most posters seem to be keen on it, and it ought to be standard practice even when there is no sign saying it.

He is, but he supports muslims if it gives him an excuse to cry "racism".

What are you trying to say? God botherers includes muslims and adherents of many other religions. Most of them don't antagonise people the way some muslims do.

The only reason most people object to Muslims is because of the actions and words of some muslims.

Only a third? What religions did the other 2/3 target, and who did the targetting?

Quite, if it weren't for the influx of immigrants the whole situation would be different, and the roles would be filled by native Brits. Years ago, 1970s-80s motorway service areas were mainly staffed by oldish folks making a bit of pin money. After Schengen they disappeared, replaced by young...

OK, you haven't said where the 69.2% in earlier post comes from. But it's not important.