Search results

A good example which shows that not only do you find truth boring, you actually despise and deny it.

So KB asked a question, and you replied to it with something that you didn't think for a moment was a proper answer. Do you think that's the way that intelligent and civil discussing and debating should be done?

Mottie finds truth boring.

How much of that "investment", so far, has been beneficial to the UK?

You see a "booby". I see a "non-racist, not consumed by hatred and bigotry, and not spaffing out lies".

What makes you think they are compelled to only seek asylum in those places?

They're going to be given free dogs, too, so that their integration can be helped by interactions with fellow dog walkers.

Somebody else might.

No, but it is, technically assault/abuse/rape because the law says that people that age cannot give consent. It also says that if they share "indecent" photos with each other that's an offence. Then there's this: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/jul/31/childprotection.society DISCLAIMER...

For the good of society.

Do you understand that people are entitled to claim asylum in the country of their choice? How should they claim asylum here?

If you agree, why then did you write this?

Do you understand that these questions require proper consideration and answers?

What should they do if they want to claim asylum here?

Do you understand that these questions require proper consideration and answers, not being ignored or responded to with repeated banging on about "illegality"?

No.

More expressions of racism.

What's your view on all the recent reports about it in the media?

You tell us.