Search results

The signal was going to stop a year or so ago, but it kept being delayed. And it varied around the country. The odd thing is mine stopped 3 months back but has now re-started. Interesting to see if it stays on.

Same here. I tried it once in about 2004 in the Mall of America, Minneapolis. I assumed it was proper beer. I took one swig and left the rest.

I will, I'll be interested too

That's right with a RTS. The readings are going where they used to before the RTS was switched off. My electric use varies very little throughout the year, and the total this time, and the night rate fraction, are in line with all the previous.

Why's that? Do you have an RTS and the signal is due to be switched off?

Strange goings-on - after RTS switchoff I had zero night consumption for 3 months, but took readings today and I have night consumption again! Ratio night/total 16%, similar to before switchoff. Anybody know what's happening?

At one time Bass could be relied on the scour you, but it seems to have changed.

Not raw sewage, there'd be too much of it! It would be primary sludge, from the primary sedimentation tanks, typically 5% solids. Until it was banned, late last century IIRC, primary sludge from sewage works in Liverpool and Manchester was routinely taken out and dumped in the Irish Sea. Mostly...

Particularly when no control is retained over executives' pay, bonuses and dividends etc. It's gone just the way anybody could have predicted.

And the lawyers' bills

I could be wrong, but I thought refrigerants were bad due to damaging the ozone layer, not for causing global warming.

Is there a difference? And in 1609 it would have been an Englishman and presumably a few colleagues. Not "England", which stayed where it was. Much less Britain.

How do you know how they feel? Have any of your children been murdered?

Serious questions - are immigrants housed near where you live, and do you have any daughters?

As well as the boiler, pump and any motorised valves. We don't have enough info to comment IMO.

Where did I say the RNLI shouldn't rescue migrants in danger? I just said the migrants shouldn't put themselves at risk, and neither should irresponsible hill walkers. They should claim asylum in the first safe country

Your stupidity knows no bounds. Nobody's defending R Lowe. Haven't you anything better to do than write these idiotic posts?

So you agree with me then?

I've a suggestion for anybody not wanting to risk drowning in the Channel - don't get in a boat and try to illegally migrate to the UK. They could try claiming asylum in one of the several safe countries they've passed through. And that's the minority who are fleeing a genuinely unsafe country...

Do you really think Rupert Lowe's crass remark will cause them distress compared with that of the murders?