Search results for query: corbyn

I see the Lefties are pleased. JohnD will be delighted at his campaign efforts. Another "Oh Jeremy Corbyn" moment. :LOL:

Yeah, track suit on a 70 year old politician. Perfectly normal…..

They have no minds, which is why they just make things up.

Jeremy Corbyn got sh*t for wearing a tracksuit from Sports Direct. I wish the righty leaning people would make their fkin minds up.

Jo Cox was a target of a loony right wing fruitcake, she was a thoroughly decent person and did absolutely nothing to provoke an attack, whereas Farage is a dishonest, corrupt and divisive figure, and I can understand why someone might want to throw a milkshake over his face, but other than that...

...Amiss Anne Widdecombe All the perpetrators should be strung up imo Fact is elected politicians are no longer safe in the UK I recall Corbyn when he was labour leader was accosted / abused and pushed around whilst riding his bike in a park Fact is farage is a target for the looney...

In both 2017 & 2019, more people voted Labour when Corbyn was leader than voted for Starmer. 33% more in 2017. So I'm not sure your analysis is accurate.

I'm not convinced of that.

Corbyn was anti-royal, he'd have got rid of them all, which worried the establishment that actually runs the UK from behind this democracy stageshow. It was obvious when we reached the point when it was decided he was a threat to the deep state. The BBC and other establishment media turned on...

He was the shambles, not Corbyn. Corbyn was doing very well until they mooted the idea of a second referendum, then they suddenly lost a lot of support. First he brought down Corbyn's Labour and now he's brought down his own Labour, the man is a walking disaster area, he should be coned off...

How can you say that without know who the successor will be? :rolleyes: As I said "pure uninformed tribalism".

He sounds like a God. Why is he leaving?

looks like Labour prefer the Corbyn setup.

He turned the Labour party around from a post-Corbyn shambles to a sound beating of Tories two years later.

Apologies. I meant Labour prime minister.

Corbyn, Mad Ed, Gordon Brown, Michael Foot, John Smith, Callaghan, Lansbury, Clynes, Hardie, they all lasted less time than the Onanist.

Why do some people insist on misrepresenting history? Are they not aware that the truth is available to not only refute their claims, but also to illustrate how corrupt are their memories.

When SKS replaced Corbyn I was quite pleased as I thought he was an enabling opposition leader. That thought persisted until lockdown when he started whittling about how to get out of Lockdown 3 weeks after it was imposed. Today I'm still not impressed. The Labour government under his...

You have a poor recollection of history. Starmer followed Corbyn, but he was only elected by just over 50% of the vote. So your recollection is evidently erroneous, or intentionally badly presented, and you wouldn't do that, would you. :rolleyes: Relatively, more competent than the previous...

I think John would make a good politician,