Search results

It's no different to the luddites. Stop progress, keep a load of inefficient jobs going. Until someone elsewhere undercuts you and you end up with no jobs instead of some.

You'd need soviet levels of spin and delusion to think this was just an 8-10% lead... It's much more important to look at the trend. Reform flat but stable, labour just down every time.

The latest from Findoutnow says this... Labour are over. Possibly permanently, or at least until enough new dumb voters can't remember the last time they had a go.

They don't look like a full spectrum of the polls, I suspect they were cherry-picked by the resident commie. But all before the budget from hell and the latest scandals.

Probably a lot less bad than if comrade Corbyn had got elected, who knows how bleak that would have turned out. The choices definitely weren't good. On the other hand, perhaps it could have been better than Boris, as Starmer definitely wouldn't have got elected after.

Starmer's "landslide" victory resulted from 32% of voters or about 20% of those eligible to vote. Hope Starmer's not making the interior of no.10 too flouncy and fluffy. It would save redecorating costs if he makes it reasonably manly, ready for a proper bloke to take over.

I really, really hope you're joking. If not you're confirming what everyone thinks of labour voters!