Search results

Oh right. Do they only hold those dealt with by LABC, or are the AI ones there as well?

In general, I think the only way a conveyancer or other interested party would know you had work signed off by Building Control is if you gave them a certifcate to that effect. I find it a bit weird that PP is a matter of public record and BC isn't. If I live next door to you, I think it would...

Yep, some are; most aren't.

Is a planning application fee payable where development that would otherwise have been permitted development requires a planning application? Yes, a planning application fee may be payable. Details of planning fees are set out in the 2012 Fees Regulations, as amended. Paragraph: 041 Reference...

Nevertheless, there are sample letters, and individually, they correctly set out the terms under the relevant part of the act. Serving incomplete or incorrect notices invalidates the process, so be careful.

Actually, I think your builder has it correct; the party structure notice relates to the insertion of beams on padstones, and the line of junction covers the hip to gable conversion.

It doesn't sound to me like you want to build on the line of junction. Are you also building a rear extension, say?

Don't mix feet and metres

You're not. :rolleyes:

If you had somewhere else to stick the earth, could get a mini digger on site, and could provide decent drainage all round, it might be an idea to excavate a foot or so of soil.

Luckily, planners don't get a look in.

Note that when submitting a prior approval notification, you are required to submit 'a plan' to 'the council' (not the planning department per se). The council can only request more information if neighbours raise concerns, so for this particular notification, it can make sense to submit less...

...of the offending erection

Sorry. I cannot see what part of this my previous answer fails to address

Just to clarify, the BCO was referring to the opening part of the window, which isn't necessarily quite the same thing. Part F certainly implies that compliance would be met by providing a wind*ow* with the requisite openable area, but I don't see why the BCO wouldn't accept your alternative...

I'm aware that people have installed AC without PP, but yes, it's development and would properly entail a planning application accompanied by a background noise assessment.

If you go online and look at examples of recent planning applications in your area, you will probably see that Woody's valiant efforts are not far off from much of what gets approved (The local authority might take issuse with the solid fuel fire, however)

Deleted.

As drawn, I cannot see how this would be inferred as type 'B', but probably I'm missing something obvious.

You mean an application for a certificate of lawfulness for proposed use or development? Just curious- who advised this?