Search results

I think his empathy views were grammatical and technical. He didn’t believe that empathy was possible because he didn’t think it was possible to share someone else’s feelings. He didn’t believe in sympathy, ie consideration of someone else’s feelings. I don’t agree with his views on empathy...

How was Charlie Kirk against free speech?

How did Charlie Kirk demean women?

Used to be. Not any more.

I didn't expect that to be true, but it appears to have been reported in main stream media. Unbelievable.

The anti semitism would lead me to believe he was left leaning on its own...

There are idiots in the UK actively blocking stop and search and other mechanisms the police could use to reduce the amount of knives carried on the streets. Sadiq Kahn for example.

and in the same vein, its never been easier or more common to carry a knife or be a victim of knife crime in the UK, thanks to the liberal left. To many people living by the sword as a result....

and as per Rayner, Starmer supports him way beyond the point that it was clear he was going to have to go. Bad judgement in appointing him in the first place, and bad judgement in either not sacking him straight away or fully standing by him. By dithering, he's just made himself look weak, again.

He was, but people chose to engage and he engaged back. He didn't attempt to shut down the conversation, he encouraged it. The opposite of the 'kill a TERF' brigade for example who want to shut down any conversation that doesn't agree with theirs.

As i said, that used to be the assumption. But Trumps attempted assassination and Charlie Kirk's murder changes that assumption.

I agree. Ownership and the daily carrying of guns are different. I have a shot gun licence and shoot regularly, but the gun is only out of its cabinet going to, during and from a shoot. I certainly don't carry it around routinely. In addition, having been the victim of an attempted break whilst...

and i 100% agree. Look at knife crime. When people carry knives, knives get used. If they're weren't carried by so many people, i guarantee there would be less knife crime.

it's both sides that are increasing the hatred, but its reasonable to attribute this murder to a leftist and i presume the attempted murder of trump was a leftist. The general consensus is that it's the extreme right wing that perpetrate violence and that the left are vocal but not physical...

Ironically, Charlie Kirk was a right-winger who's raison d'être was to actively encouraged debate. I think its reasonable ot assume that the person that shot him has done so to stop him airing his views. It's time that we started to accept that people have different opinions and not try to...

You missed a bit from the article you linked to which goes on to say…. ‘in those two instances, that advice was qualified by the acknowledgement that it did not constitute expert tax advice and was accompanied by a suggestion, or in one case a recommendation, that specific tax advice be...

Sorry, i missed out an important word in my previous post (now edited). As a trustee, you are expected to know what you have greater responsibilities than a layman. As such, and particularly as an MP and Housing Minister, you should be aware that you need to consult with proper legal advisors...

When you are a trustee, you are expected to have more than basic knowledge of your responsibilities. The so called legal advisors she's claimed she's used have turned round and said they didn't advise her. She'll be gone by the end of the day.

...as part of her divorce process that she and her ex husband would have asked for.

There may be no evidence, but why else would you set up a trust? I have a disabled brother, and we have a family trust that was set up when my father died specifically to avoid the state swallowing up his inheritance to fund state care. It means that my parents could/can leave him money in...