Search results

Posting erroe

.

Because the issue is driving without due care and there was an accident they deem that I am already aware and therefore the police don't need to let me know within 14 days. The whole thing is bizarre and odd

. Error

Sorry yes it does state the location and the time of which I reported to the insurance company. Which should be this incident. My brother who is a cop and recently completed his road traffic course finds the whole thing very strange and is convinced that something else is at play here as there...

I've got the letter yes, not the envelope.

Spoke to Patterson law and she advised not to send any further letters to the police, she said the 14 days doesn't stand in this case, and it may be that they are investigating the other driver and not me. She did say the case sounded unusual and to wait for further correspondence from the...

I've just spoke to my insurance company, and they have advised that the claim had already been settled with a no fault on either party As I was talking to her about one call (my insurance broker) passing me over to her (the under writer) she had a letter posted on their system dated 22/12/22...

Thanks I read that last night. So I should just ask that the nip be rejected due to being 15 days over due?

Yes this is why I say it is 50/50 at most, obviously this is just my opinion though

No I was advised this after sending the s172 form back. I was going to send a letter today detailing the dates and reference number, and asked that should the matter be taken further that more information is provided to me so I can appoint a solicitor.

I was pulling over at the same time, Most of it has since polished out

No that's fine, and obviously he wasn't oblivious, but I'm not to know that, all I know is that he made no attempt to stop and refused to look at my.direction with a beep of the horn and doesn't explain why he didn't pull over to begin with. I also wasn't being aggressive there was no hand...

Because I wanted to swap details I'm not very good at remembering registrations, as I still had a 20 minute drive to collect my boy from childcare before then going home, and also to see if he even knew an accident had occured. The bloke just seemed completely oblivious to anything around him.

From what I can gather the 14 day rule doesn't apply in this case due to the collision and thus the 14 day rule is voided as I was aware of the incident due to the "crash"

As I said I didn't chase, I was following in traffic, I made an attempt to pull over, I indicated and beeped but he continued, so I continued on in the traffic, if you knew the road as it is at the moment at rush hour due to the road works it's very much stop start and slow moving, with 2 slip...

Whichever way the land lies, I don't think it quite warrants a driving without due care slapped against it when there is no other evidence other than he said she said. Had it been any other person the police wouldn't have got involved and left it to the insurance companies to sort. I didn't try...

Not when I was the car already in front, the other car was around 2 car lengths in front of the van in the photo between the photo and the van at the time of me merging. The facts are that at that point I had right of way as the lanes were considered 1

Thanks I do have one on order now

I can't imagine any injury because it was literally just a scrape no bouncing or anything and at low speed