Search results

That's exactly what humanity will be doing from 2050 onwards if we rely on windmills and sunshine.

That's not why I don't want to see 100% renewables, as I've said several times.

I said the technology would change the world, not the first plant. Obviously. And I haven't changed my mind about anything. I said that implementation would be expensive. Once established and widespread, power will cost essentially nothing. And it won't just be domestic energy costs that will...

Agreed, that kind of thing is very serious. The boss of an anti-racism charity has apologised after wrongly tweeting that a Muslim woman had been attacked with acid during rioting. Nick Lowles, chief executive of Hope Not Hate used Twitter on Saturday night to claim there had been reports of...

Not that this has anything to do with the topic, but since you're interested. "If you count the total area of wind farm sites (including the spacing between turbines), the figure is around 1,930 square miles - though most of this land remains usable for agriculture or other purposes... ...As...

The storage alone would take billions to spec and implement. The technology doesn't even exist for 100% implementation. We won't even go into the thousands of square miles of countryside needed to house the windmills and the mirrors. And then what do we have? Non-scalable, unreliable energy...

The law on protests was fine until certain groups decided to act in bad faith. For decades protests were sporadic, planned and purposeful. Now the pro-terror crowd and the climate loons want to redefine the word to mean maximum disruption at any and all times until they get their way. That's not...

"Despite this, fusion research is on track to produce world-changing results in 30 - 50 years." Maybe if I phrase it like this - myQuote.find("cheap")=0 Why are you comparing fusion with fission? One of the biggests costs of fission is waste management and decommissioning. It's cited to take...

1) It has historically had around 20 - 30 million a year. For the past two years it's barely scraped a billion. A billion is nothing when compared to overall government spending. The absurdity of spending hundreds of billions to effect best case a change 40 times below that scientifically...

It's hard for you to understand, clearly, but very easy for anyone capable of following a basic line of reasoning. 1) Fusion research has had very little funding. 2) Despite this, fusion research is on track to produce world-changing results in 30 - 50 years. ...hold on, this is the part you...

"Although he is a polarizing figure, Robinson is asking to be heard in his own words. It has become so easy to dismiss the ideas of those you don’t want to hear by branding them as racist, or bigoted. But as time has gone on, as the sense of threat grows and the responses to Jewish pain have...

I can reveal to you that 2025 + 30 = 2055, and 2055 is at least 2050. Not that it's remotely relevant to my argument, which you appear incapable of understanding.

You do.

The clue is in the definition of the words. But if you are so eager to attribute an arson attack on a religious building to terrorism, maybe start with the dozens of churches that are set on fire every year, with hundreds more being vandalised, but never make the headlines because you know, who...

The fact you asked AI to work it out for you says everything. The point is, it's impossible. It doesn't matter if it's a thousand or a million or a quadrillion, it is impossible to implement.

So given that scientific consensus is that we'll see fusion power generation within 30 years, despite the fact it has received almost no government funding, would you like to reconsider your statement that 'Fusion is just a dream'?

Don't pretend you know anything about the topic. It's embarrassing to witness.

Round and round we go. Why people can't just read a few posts is beyond me.

Mining space, eh. Google's working hard for you today. Give a rundown on how we can 'mine space' using windmills and solar panels. Oh yes, loads of power. We'd only need to cover an area around the size of a billion football pitches to equal the theoretical output of a small fusion reactor...

Point to one single post I've made advocating for fossil fuels and I'll address that. Funny, I thought you were talking about fossil fuels.