Search results

Sainsbury's pah Lidle are 8p a bag. ;)

Reminds me I need to pop into Screwfix today. Hope recovery goes well.

Direct from the Horse's mouth. Labour politicians = deceitful liars.

Trigeminal Neuralgia - I sincerely hope not. Even at its mildest forms debilitating and life changing with limited treatment options.

Well turn coat 101 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14201483/Liz-Kendall-DISMISSES-calls-10-5bn-compensation-called-WASPI-women-saying-suffered-no-direct-financial-loss-bungled-communications-pension-state-age-increase.html

Is Liz a paid up member of the Conservative party? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/waspi-women-pension-compensation-labour-b2665736.html

Eevn for this forum this is comedy gold.

From the one who won't answer the simple question. Goodnight, Carmen

No neither of you have answered the question. I don't think this one is as simple as the politicians make out. I have already answered not directly but more than either of you. The last politician I believed was Michael Foot. The rest from then lie and you can tell that when their lips move...

Ok Carmen you answer first why did she resign if her record had already been disclosed to Starmer?

Bless Carmen it's not realy that simple though is it. Starmer was aware of her offending when he appointed her. So why resign? Denso and you seem to be avoiding the answer. Not that I am surprised but its illustrative that you both follow the same path. All politicians are deceitful liars. The...

If it's all irrelevant and baloney, why did she resign? Deja Vue again post 43 from Denso

Carmen that's a little disingenuous as you would have quoted me from post 68 and my correction was post 71. Not really much further then - well actually before.

Carmen please do keep up.

Post No. 19 is illustrative of colours

Ah yes sorry my mistake - should have listed as dishonesty.

Thanks Harry. Decent car but the shoes in disk hand break solution is flawed. Hopefully the shoes are not mounted on the back splash plate.

There seems to be a lot of posters here who don't have any experience or understanding of evidence and it's limitations in relation to offences in even magistrates never mind crown court.

Is it all irrelevant as well that we have a government minster convicted of fraud and a PM well aware of it while condemning others for the same.

But it's not nonsense is it.