Search results

:facepalm:

It's still a sentence (an interrogative sentence to be precise). Get back to school. No glasshouses here, chum.

:)

Yawn. Well done. No, I don't think I could have. Should've been a question mark at the end of that sentence. No, I don't think it was. :twisted: PS. don't feed the troll (me, in this instance).

Look in your copy of the IET Code of Practice, that you must own if you passed C&G 2377.

It would need a fuse, though...

Not standards or regs, but this document for NHS Scotland some years back might be of use: www.hfs.scot.nhs.uk/publications/PSAN9504.pdf

Nor does the utter cobblers you keep trotting out, you deluded individual. Thank goodness you're making a name for yourself on here and the IET forum. The more rubbish you post, the less likely unsuspecting readers will purchase your pamphlets, except as a comedy item.

Fixed that for you.

No-one is trying to get you barred. They are just advocating that people choose the 'Ignore' option if they want. You would still be at liberty to post on the forum, but people who have 'opted out' would no longer see your posts. Please don't add paranoia to your already long list of...

Bless you David. You still understand nothing, yet parade your ignorance for all to see. A truly deluded individual, a point all members of both forums agree upon.

That would never happen to david911knobsinge. Don't you understand, he's an expert at electricals!

No, David, no-one on either forum has said anything of the sort. Your gross misunderstanding of what they have said has led you to this erroneous belief. Your silly arguments and theories have been slapped down, again & again, wherever you've posted them, and still you post more drivel. It...

Marvellous work by Diyisfun! It's such a great reply, I don't even understand most of it :D

He certainly is, but some people on this forum are so desperate to post their reply, they don't bother reading or understanding the OP, and hence, you get rather pointless posts as evidenced by posts 2 & 3 above. To the OP: The calibration certificates for our PAT tetsers at work (issued...

You are a singular individual, Cockburn. You get totally owned on both the IET and this forum, time and time again, yet your ignorance is such that you soldier on, letting logic and correct information go completely over your head. As has been pointed out to you already, both on here and on...

But the OP hasn't got an old PAT tester, has he? He's got an old PAT tester checkbox. So your rambling story bears no relevance to the thread, does it?

Fair enough. It's just that the phrase 'technical gobbledeygook' seemed to imply the opposite.

Nope. Everyone I know who has been on the IET-run C&G 2377 courses in London has found them very straightforward. C&G 2377 itself is just a test to see if you can use the IEE Code of Practice, so your point would really be down to how the training is being delivered, combined with the...

What laughable rubbish!