Search results

Not like every other government has done then

Unfortunately that means such tools need to be inaccessible

Id say you and her can choose what you wear and do, without anybody interfering. Would you say the same about people creating child sexual pictures ? Or even fake pics of lena?

Some seem to be saying there's no issue with such ai tooling. Ai needs some limits. Women and children need to be safe, from online as well as in life, predators

I see no need for people to support such systems and use. There's no safe child porn

Does the woman or child consent ?

Ai is likely to be very useful and grow and grow in its use. But it needs to be for the right use

I think people are showing where they sit. And again, it's a type

Do you 2 support x and grok in this ? Yes or no, no squirming

Appears to be some serious supporters of free speech to allow everything. I assume that means all terrorism and child sexual stuff. Wow people. Let me be very clear. I fully support free speech, with accountability and responsibility. Not with abuse.

Either you accept objectifying unconsenting CHILDREN and adults from being sexually pictures, or you dont. Nothing wrong with ai or x. But it doesn't or shouldn't, come with a free pass to abuse others. Anybody, adult, that wants to pose, for free or payment should be allowed to. Do you...

No Just needs x to self censor Government censorship shouldn't be needed. Unless of course they feel sexual exploitation is normal free speech

Missed out the point about sexual images of children And it's ok to do this to women and children without their consent ?

So you support this sexual ai ? That's not free speech, that's abuse. You should stay quiet on this matter if that's how you feel . Or any label that gets attached to you would be correct !

Absolute rubbish Do you agree with uncontrolled abuse of women and children as being free speech? Sinking to some very low levels I think. If these pictures were on advertising posters they wouldn't be allowed. Why is it allowed elsewhere? Be careful what you stand for !

Nice attempt at a diversion, but another fail

Other councils are doing badly too That's the point. What have reform done better ?

No Just stating the obvious. That you and others cannot or will not see

Missed the point though You've just proven that they are no better than the other councils. So why can anybody expect them to run the country better ?

Where has it been shown ? More bs ?