Search results

Youd still get the centrists appearing in both sections

Can you name those who aren't ?

Notice who used the term though.

Notice it's the reform supporters who can find all this so 1 sided. A lack of looking with open minds

Where she was repeatedly told to move her car? Which she was doing

It was a very confusing state of affairs for both "sides" of this event. But the woman was not a "terrorist". The fact that 1 side has come out trying to label her as such has massive connotations. A cover up is part of that. The city authorities disagree with the federal view before it's...

Not according to the city authorities.

And you , and her, would know that, how ? Women should be safe on the street. If the agents know so much about her they could serve these papers when she is "safe" at home. But a lot of people in USA don't feel safe anywhere now

Trigger happy Sort of getting there, I think

You don't like to see trump criticised? Even though his actions have an effect on us? Censorship anyone

And yet you have another name in here, as does another "new" poster. You really shouldn't criticise for others doing the same as you

Secure, not insecure

She was also told to move the car.

So you don't watch the bbc but you know they haven't covered the story? Then you find out they have. Fillyfacts

Bullets can't go right through a car or ricochet off it? Firing a gun is dangerous

Wasn't filly 1 of those that claimed he never watches bbc because of the bias ?

Who has to hide behind another name

I thought you supported women being able to feel safe

I think that was his point

No, they are all full of lefties