Search results

Very funny. What is your comment regarding Ukraine being complicit in the Holocaust? ?

Not fiction. Hard facts. Time you grew a pair and joined the real world

Ha ha ha you’re a lazy man do some research. So Russia / NATO Had no agreement regarding nato encroachment near Russia ? It began with Gorbachev following the dissolution of the cccp

The first causality of war is the truth. America and NATO have reneged on agreements regarding missiles and troops near Russian borders. The Ukraine also reneged on the first and second Minsk agreements. The US had a hand in the 2014 coup in Ukraine where shortly afterwards, the Russian...

it’s got worse. Why are you so determined to defend something that clearly has a bad effect on some people. Presumably if it’s no one in your family then it’s ok and just a load of conspiracy nutters

Why won’t the medical establishment and the big pharmaceutical companies investigate it for the benefit of humanity seeing as they have made billions

So the recent upsurge in myocarditis is a conspiracy theory ?

Big pharmas got you under their spell

If you don’t recognise the “link” between the mRNA vaccines and excess deaths and illness then you are very stupid. There is no link, it is discussed in the vid you didn’t watch because you can’t back down

Ok a Japanese report states 1 in 1000 serious adverse reactions to phi ser and 1 in 650 to Moderna. Now put your head back in the sand

Nothing new ? Your crazy. Hopefully others with a sane mind will watch it and gain knowledge. Did you miss the Japanese report ? 1 in 1000. Serious adverse events. ? Moderna 1 in 650 You must be employed by phi ser

Watch it. Then comment

Are we confusing jabs. There is emerging evidence that the mnra jabs are not suitable for young people

Baby lamb with a nappy

Dr Malhotra mentions vaccine adverse outcomes during statin discussion.

What is your response to the information given in the first 3 minutes Is it true that previous vaccines have been pulled for far lower adverse reports or not ?

What is your response to the information given in the first 3 minutes?

I apologise then. So do you think he’s a charlatan or giving an accurate representation of the paper ?

Dear old dense o foaming at the mouth to discredit something he’s to arrogant to watch

Just watch the first 2 mins