Search results

Just fix one of these or similar to the back and one on the underneath with some suitable screws, IKEA stuff is frankly sometimes a bit naff and need repairing, then move on with your life. Forget about filler...

This thread reminds me of the Amy Winehouse thread. :(

@Burnerman

As it's being painted I'd just go with some Ronseal two part.

Yea surprised me too. :D

The conservatory company is wrong (and more than likely they know it only too well) but I too would just do it but build over the drain by the books - that is adopting all of the measures necessary as if you were doing a build over. That said I would never build a conservatory anyway, they're...

The manhole should be positioned where your house connections enter enter it, not randomly somewhere on the pipe run.

Every council has their own planning policy, it's called the "Local Plan". Within it they provide policy and guidance with regards to how development should be considered within the borough and it's what the planners use to determine whether a planning approval should be approved or not. There...

No the planning permission.

I bought a Macalister one from B&Q, cheap as chips (£40 on offer) it's utterly crap, needed quite a bit of 'adjustment' before it was anything like flat though does accommodate quite a bit of length (ooer missus). But I can't imagine using a mitre saw on the ground.

Shame on you Harry, shame on you.

Something like https://www.lenovo.com/gb/en/p/tablets/lenovo-tab-series/lenovo-tab-one/len103l0027?orgRef=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%252F&srsltid=AfmBOoqhyUON0Bfzl4JzlJe0WLoAg76tc5wKks550EepVM18MGfMrI-w would be fine, we've found Lenovo tablets pretty good in this household, perform well...

Needs a structural engineer really for a beast like that, probably block work if purely DIYing, walls will be pretty thick (rule of thumb for retaining walls is the thickness at the base should be about 1/3 of the height) so about 600 or 3 block wide at the base.

They will most likely refuse a manhole inside.

You need a household application (which is PP) because that is the correct thing to do, not to be on the safe side. Sounds like he's back tracking to me.

Even if the first shot could somehow be justified the second and third cannot, seems there's a fair bit of case law being banded about saying as such eg Orn vs. City of Tacoma: an officer lacks an objectively reasonable basis for believing that his own safety is at risk when firing into the...

:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Second shot: Third shot:

He must have had a very long arm to be able to shoot two rounds into a side window when she was driving towards him, injuring him in the process.