Search results

They're not. The policy states they are "free to come and go as they please". The only restriction is their residence. Unless there is evidence they are a danger to the public or a flight risk. On a wider note, are you wrong about everything you post or are there some posts of yours I've not read?

At least you're admitting that the 'asylum seekers' are 'fit young men'. Obviously the women and the children don't need asylum because they're toughing it out back home.

I was talking of the left's hypocrisy. Immigrants welcome! (But only if they slave for low wages on our behalf).

Trolls cause a lot of damage too. Just watch Troll Hunter. Great film.

You're so right. The only arrests ever made in Britain are on protests. If there are 150,000 people in a city on an ordinary day, none will get arrested. That's why we have no crime in the UK. Utter melt.

I really didn't need confirmation.

What the hell..? It doesn't 'lessen damage' but it's pretty uncontroversial to say there is very little damage caused by tornadoes in the UK.

Only a moron would keep asking the same question on forums and whine about the answers instead of actually educating themselves. Or better yet, actually visiting the countries they're talking about. Ever been to Japan? Nope. Ever been to any of the countries you've talked about? Er, nope, not...

If I made a concerted effort to be inaccurate, wrong and simply as delusional as you, I couldn't manage it. Have you trained it in or something?

Your logic, like your education, needs attention.

So you posed the question of what would have happened to this country if it had taken a radically different approach to immigration, the economy and society in its entirety, and you don't think it would have resulted in a 'very different economy and culture'? Bizarre, to say the least.

As you can see, he either didn't try or he tried and failed.

We'd have ended up like Japan. Not the worst outcome in the world, but not the best either. But if we'd have continued the post-war immigration policies rather than throw the doors open to the most backwards cultures on Earth, and now to literally anybody who rocks up on our beaches, things...

If you paid more for the role the Brits would be happy to do it. Obviously. And they do get the same wages. It would be illegal to give immigrants lower wages for the same role. Again, obviously.

Met Police figures: From 150,000 people plus 5000 counter protest, 23 were arrested in total. 22 were from the main protest. Of these, 11 were for violence or the threat of violence. 8 people have been charged, 5 of these for a violence-related crime. So that's 0.005% of the marchers charged...

In other words you support immigrants as long as they do the horrible, low paid jobs that the British are loathe to do, plus jobs where they clean for us, serve us and generally labour on low pay for our benefit. Be sure to tune in next week for more Lovely Liberal Ideas!

Is there anything you say that is based in fact? It's incomprehensible to me that in this day and age, where you can type your question and get an immediate answer, referenced and sourced, that anyone would consistently post blatant nonsense like you do. It's almost like you're desperate to...

No

You wonder about any old crap that comes to mind, unfortunately.

The utter stupidity of that post.